October 26, 2012 in Idaho

Numbers correct, cause unclear in ad opposing Idaho Props 1, 2 and 3

By The Spokesman-Review
 
What the ad says

Caldwell mom Erin Smith is shown with her daughter, saying, “Until she was 5, I was Kelsey’s first teacher. Now I rely on the strength and dedication of Idaho’s teachers to help Kelsey learn. But since the Legislature passed Props 1, 2 and 3, over 1,800 Idaho teachers have left teaching. I want my daughter to get a great education, but the Luna laws and their top-down mandates are driving away some of our best and brightest teachers. Nothing’s more important to me than Kelsey’s education. Props 1, 2 and 3 are just too big of a risk.”

BOISE – The latest TV campaign commercial from opponents of Idaho’s school reform propositions focuses on the number of Idaho teachers who have left the profession since the laws passed in 2011.

“Since the Legislature passed Props 1, 2 and 3, over 1,800 Idaho teachers have left teaching,” the ad says.

That claim is based on data compiled by the state Department of Education. The department’s data shows that 1,884 certificated Idaho teachers left the profession of teaching in the 2011-’12 school year, a number that rose sharply from the 1,276 who left in the 2010-’11 year. Both those figures were way up from the 2009-’10 school year, in which the data show 716 Idaho teachers left the profession, a figure that at that point had been relatively stable for three years.

That means the ad’s claim is correct – if anything, it understates the figures. The laws passed during the 2011 legislative session; that was the 2010-’11 school year. So, depending on when in the year the teachers departed, it’s possible that as many as 3,160 Idaho school teachers have left the profession since the reform laws passed.

The new commercial, which is airing statewide, including the Spokane/Coeur d’Alene market, features a mother of a young child, Erin Smith of Caldwell, saying, “I want my daughter to get a great education, but the Luna laws and their top-down mandates are driving away some of our best and brightest teachers. Nothing’s more important to me than Kelsey’s education. Props 1, 2 and 3 are just too big of a risk.”

That cause-and-effect claim is less clear.

State schools Superintendent Tom Luna has maintained that the teacher departures were more likely related to the recession than the reform laws, which included stripping most collective bargaining rights from teachers, declaring that all teacher contracts expire each year, and forbidding consideration of seniority in teacher layoffs.

Idaho economist John Church said he can’t see much evidence for either argument – that teachers left because of the new laws, or that they left because of the recession. “It is remarkable that that number jumped up so much. But the causality behind that, I think there are many things involved,” he said.

Luna pointed to an increase in the number of people earning teacher certification in Idaho, including through a new accelerated, alternative certification program he has lauded. As a result, despite the high number of departures, the number of Idaho teachers has remained relatively stable.

The number of new teachers certified in Idaho in the 2011-’12 school year was 1,433, up from 1,138 a year earlier.

The state’s data show that of the 1,884 teachers who left the profession last school year, 127 were fired, 143 were laid off and 957 left for “personal reasons.”

The previous year, of the 1,276 who left, 96 were fired, 85 were laid off and 697 left for personal reasons. That “personal reasons” category more than doubled from the 2009-’10 school year, while the other two categories remained virtually unchanged: 716 teachers left the state that year, including 98 who were fired, 83 who were laid off and 314 who left for personal reasons.

The data don’t show whether the teachers who left were the best or worst teachers or somewhere in the middle.


Thoughts and opinions on this story? Click here to comment >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email