August 4, 2013 in Opinion

Guest opinion: Immigration reform good for economy

Benjamin Johnson
 

As Congress takes a summer respite to figure out how to move immigration reform forward in the House, mounting evidence shows reform would be a plus to the national economy.

For instance, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) recently estimated that the immigration reform bill that passed the Senate in June would reduce the federal deficit by roughly $1 trillion over 20 years and would boost the U.S. economy as a whole without negatively affecting U.S. workers in the long run. In addition, an April report from the conservative American Action Forum authored by a former director of the CBO went further, estimating that immigration reform has the potential to decrease the cumulative federal deficit by more than $2.5 trillion over the course of just 10 years.

This sounds good for the federal government, but what’s in it for Washington state? Well, the numbers add up differently depending on what scenario Congress pursues. Lawmakers are now faced with the choices of moving to deport the undocumented, sticking with the status quo or reforming the system once and for all.

Under the scenario of “deport them all,” estimates show the state of Washington would lose $14.5 billion in economic activity, $6.4 billion in gross state product and approximately 71,197 jobs, even accounting for adequate market adjustment time, according to a report by the Perryman Group. This mass deportation of immigrants would cause a steep reduction in labor supply.

Because labor is a key factor of production, a drastic reduction in its supply would in turn lead to a contraction of the state economy and a decline in overall state fiscal revenue. Pull people out of the economy and it shrinks. In fact, more than 60 percent of all undocumented immigrants have been living and working in the state for more than a decade, which makes it even more destructive to the economy. Thus, deportation-only is anything but good policy.

What would happen if nothing changes? If we fail to reform the immigration system, we may not necessarily lose a lot from an economic perspective, but we would gain very little. Immigrants, even the unauthorized, are already contributing to the state’s economy.

For example, immigrants in the state of Washington comprised 16.2 percent of the state’s workforce in 2011 (or 572,207 workers), according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Immigrants also contributed $1.5 billion in tax revenue to the Washington state economy in 2007, accounting for 13.2 percent of all taxes paid in the state, according to a 2009 study by OneAmerica. Finally, immigrants accounted for 16 percent of total economic output in the Seattle metropolitan area alone, according to a study by the Fiscal Policy Institute.

However, because of their status, undocumented immigrants are not contributing to their full potential. If they were legalized, many currently unauthorized immigrants would transition into the formal economy, which would lead to an increase in their average wages and a growth in their productivity. In addition, under the status quo scenario, the state would continue to deprive itself of new legal immigrant workers who could fill positions in occupations in high demand when the economy is growing.

Alternatively, let’s say the House finds the political courage to tackle reform, assuring all resident immigrants are working legally and fully contributing, and that new legal immigrants are welcomed when the economy is growing. Under this scenario, the economic contributions of immigrants will grow. According to a new report from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, for example, a newly legalized immigrant workforce in Washington would pay additional personal and consumer taxes in excess of $20.2 million a year, and that goes directly into the state’s coffers.

Add to this the reality that millions of baby boomers are aging into retirement. As a result, immigrants and their children will play an increasingly important role in labor force and small-business growth. The number of people age 65-plus will rise from 40.2 million in 2010 to 88.5 million in 2050. Immigrants will play an increasingly pivotal role in sustaining programs such as Social Security and Medicare.

The choices about immigration reform may seem purely political at times, but in reality, this is an economic choice. Politicians who favor immigration reform that includes a workable strategy for dealing with undocumented immigrants are doing more than making a political calculation. They are showing that they care about the long-term economic outlook of the United States, the well-being of thousands of baby boomers moving into retirement, and the fiscal and economic health of their states.

Benjamin Johnson is the executive director of the American Immigration Council in Washington, D.C.

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus