August 10, 2013 in Nation/World

Obama calls for spying reforms

Tighter control of Patriot Act power among proposals
Anita Kumar Michael Doyle
 
Associated Press photo

President Barack Obama speaks during a news conference in the East Room at the White House in Washington on Friday.
(Full-size photo)

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama unveiled a series of proposals Friday that could curtail the federal government’s ability to spy on Americans, in light of eroding confidence by the public after recent leaks about the massive surveillance programs.

Obama announced at a news conference that in an effort to provide greater oversight and transparency, he will urge changes to the USA Patriot Act, which bolstered law enforcement’s ability to gather intelligence in the United States after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and to the secret court that approves government surveillance programs.

“It’s not enough for me as president to have confidence in these programs,” Obama said in the White House’s ornate East Room. “The American people need to have confidence in them, as well.”

The president spoke in generalities, failing to outline many specific changes, saying simply that he will need to convince a divided – and often dysfunctional – Congress to make the most significant modifications.

On Capitol Hill, some lawmakers from both parties have supported the surveillance programs for years, while others said they were never informed of the extent of the data collection and want changes.

Obama’s decision marks a stunning turnaround for a president who has repeatedly downplayed the scope of the programs since newspapers revealed in early June that the National Security Agency is collecting the telephone records of tens of millions of Verizon customers, as well as emails through nine companies, including tech giants Microsoft, Yahoo, Google and Facebook. He dismissed the uproar over the programs revealed by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden as “hype.”

Obama said he was trying to strike a balance between protecting Americans and providing the appropriate oversight to guard against abuse.

“I want to make clear, once again, that America is not interested in spying on ordinary people,” he said. “Our intelligence is focused above all on finding the information that’s necessary to protect our people, and in many cases, protect our allies.”

Obama has spent weeks meeting with people behind closed doors as he developed his proposal. This week, he held sessions with technology industry lobbyists, civil liberties advocates and the CEOs of major technology companies, including Apple and AT&T.

The president said that his administration, which already has taken the unprecedented step of disclosing a number of documents related to the surveillance programs, would declassify a series of others about the NSA’s purpose and the government’s rationale for conducting surveillance.

He also will appoint a full-time civil liberties and privacy officer, create a website to release documents and appoint a task force of outside experts to review the programs. The task force will provide recommendations to Obama in 60 days and then again at the end of the year.

“While the initial reforms outlined by the president are a necessary and welcome first step, they are not nearly sufficient,” said Anthony Romero, the executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Lawmakers from both parties have proposed legislation in recent weeks that would limit the scope of data collections, require an adversarial point of view when the government requests information at the secret court and add more public disclosures by the NSA.

Obama backs some of those changes, including having an adversary in the court, known as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

Support on Capitol Hill for issues related to the NSA scandal hasn’t fallen strictly along party lines, where so many other politically controversial issues break down.

Obama initially had been skeptical about surveillance programs as a presidential candidate. As a senator, he supported changes to the Patriot Act that would have required the government to convince a judge that the records it was seeking have some connection to a suspected terrorist or spy.

He said he had changed his mind after his staff evaluated the programs and expanded some of the safeguards. As president, he signed off on them, continuing many of the programs that his Republican predecessor, President George W. Bush, began after 9/11, and he engaged in an unprecedented crackdown on classified national security leaks.

Some of the surveillance programs are allowed under Section 215 of the Patriot Act, which authorizes the government to ask a court for documents that would assist in an investigation to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, established by Congress in 1978, signs off on the orders. It oversees domestic surveillance and operates in secret.

Some of the proposed changes are meant to offset what until now has been a one-sided process. Last year, for instance, the court reported receiving 1,789 government applications for electronic surveillance. One was withdrawn and all the others were approved, according to the court’s annual report.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has 11 members. All are federal judges taken from other courts, appointed by the chief justice of the Supreme Court. Chief Justice John Roberts has approved all the current judges.

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus