Arrow-right Camera


Ryan, Murray unveil two-year budget agreement

Wed., Dec. 11, 2013

WASHINGTON – Congressional budget negotiators reached a hard-fought deal Tuesday aimed at avoiding another government shutdown, agreeing on a plan that would restore some money to programs hit by impending across-the-board cuts, but trim spending on federal retirees and raise fees on airline travel.

Final passage of the $85 billion package, however, remains uncertain because of rising opposition from tea party lawmakers and influential conservative groups. A House vote, expected later this week, will once again test Speaker John Boehner’s ability to hold together enough Republicans to pass the compromise with support of the chamber’s Democratic minority.

The two-year deal, negotiated by the GOP’s budget point-man, Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, and his counterpart in the Senate, Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, delivered a rare bipartisan budget agreement after two years of financial brinksmanship in Washington.

“Because of this deal, the budget process can now stop lurching from crisis to crisis,” said Murray, chairwoman of the Senate Budget Committee.

Ryan, the former Republican vice presidential candidate whose political credibility may rest with his ability to sway his conservative colleagues, praised the agreement because it will further reduce the federal deficit by $23 billion and contains no new tax increases.

“I see this agreement as a step in the right direction,” Ryan said. “In divided government, you don’t always get what you want.”

The last budget standoff culminated in a 16-day shutdown in October, costing the government billions of dollars and driving Americans’ approval of Congress to record lows.

The agreement would undo $63 billion of the automatic sequester budget cuts that are set to take place over the next two years, slicing across government agencies and programs, including the Pentagon. Lawmakers from both parties, including defense hawks, are eager to avoid the arbitrary cuts.

But some tea party conservatives would prefer to live with those reductions, however painful, to keep government spending down.

Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, like Ryan a potential GOP presidential contender in 2016, opposed the deal.

“This budget continues Washington’s irresponsible budgeting decisions by spending more money than the government takes in,” Rubio said, adding that the American people “deserve better.”

The deal sets 2014 spending at $1.012 trillion, higher than the $967 billion that would have taken effect under the sequester law on Jan. 15, but less than Democrats wanted. The increased spending is paid for with new fees and cuts elsewhere in the federal budget, including reductions in federal employee retirement benefits, cuts to the cost-of-living adjustment for military retirees who are under age 62 and not injured or disabled, and new fees on airline travel.

The package does not include an extension of unemployment insurance, as President Barack Obama had sought, for an estimated 1 million jobless Americans whose benefits expire after Christmas.

“This agreement doesn’t include everything I’d like – and I know many Republicans feel the same way,” the president said. “That’s the nature of compromise. … The American people should not have to endure the pain of another government shutdown for the next two years.”


There is one comment on this story »