December 23, 2013 in Nation/World

Opposition to NSA spying mounts

Lawmakers say they’ll push to limit agency power
David G. Savage Los Angeles Times
 
Israel joins protest

JERUSALEM – Israel is the latest country to express displeasure with reports of U.S. and British spying on its leaders.

Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz said Sunday that while Israel recognizes that it is a likely target of intelligence-gathering, foreign agencies monitoring the prime minister and minister of defense “is not acceptable to us” and “not legitimate.”

Israel and the U.S. have an intelligence alliance and share the most sensitive material with each other, Steinitz added. He said the two countries must reach an agreement on “mutual prevention of espionage.”

The reports of spying on Israel came from the cache of documents taken by former U.S. National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden. According to Germany’s Der Spiegel, U.S. intelligence cooperated closely with British services in 2009 to intercept emails belonging to the offices of Israel’s prime minister and minister of defense, then Ehud Olmert and Ehud Barak, respectively. Israeli media reported Sunday that Israel’s defense establishment suspected the U.S. was using surveillance equipment to monitor Barak shortly before his appointment in 2007.

WASHINGTON – The drive to end the bulk collection of phone records by the National Security Agency is gaining strength, as Senate Democrats said Sunday that Congress will change the law to ban the practice if President Barack Obama does not do it first.

“It’s time to have real reform, not a veneer of reform,” said Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., a longtime critic of the NSA. “We have got to rebuild the American people’s trust in our intelligence community so we can be safe,” he said on ABC’s “This Week.” “But we don’t do that by bulk data collection that violates the privacy of Americans. That’s unconstitutional and has shown to not be effective.”

Last week, a federal judge said the routine collection of the dialing records is probably unconstitutional, and a panel appointed by Obama recommended a major change.

“We believe the government shouldn’t hold this data any longer,” Michael Morrell, a former acting director of the CIA and a panel member, said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

He said the phone records could be held by the phone companies or by another private group. Then, the government would “need a court order every time they wanted to query that data,” he said.

Despite the need for reforms, Morrell said the original purpose of the program still makes sense. He said it is crucial the NSA and the FBI can move quickly if there is reason to believe that a “terrorist overseas is talking to someone in the United States.”

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vt., said he will press ahead in January to pass a bill that forbids the NSA from collecting phone records. He is sponsoring the USA Freedom Act with former House Judiciary Committee Chairman F. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., to close what they now see as a loophole in the law.

The USA Patriot Act authorized the government to collect phone records and other data that would be “relevant to an authorized investigation.”

To the surprise of many in Congress, the NSA went to a secret court and won the authority to collect all the dialing records of phone calls in the United States because they might prove useful in a future investigation.


Thoughts and opinions on this story? Click here to comment >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email