New box designed that would contain lithium-ion battery
SEATTLE – Boeing on Wednesday instructed a small team of top machinists at its Auburn parts plant to begin building new, high-strength containment boxes for the lithium-ion batteries on its 787s as part of a redesign intended to get the planes flying again as soon as April.
An Auburn insider said the company ordered 200 such boxes, with the first 100 to be ready by March 18.
Boeing executives led by Commercial Airplanes CEO Ray Conner will lay out the company’s plan to Federal Aviation Administration officials Friday, but it’s unclear whether regulators will sign on to the fast-paced schedule.
Meanwhile, Boeing briefed key members of Congress in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, telling them it has developed a permanent fix to the battery problems and hopes to have the Dreamliners back in passenger service quickly, assuming expeditious FAA approval.
A congressional aide said Boeing representatives in one such meeting “were adamant that it will be a permanent fix, and rejected reports that mentioned a temporary fix.” They also cited the April target date, the aide said.
Boeing spokesman Marc Birtel declined to comment on any conversations with regulatory authorities but reiterated an earlier statement that “good progress is being made” toward finding a fix.
According to a person familiar with Boeing’s proposal, Conner plans to provide FAA head Michael Huerta details of the fix along lines previously reported: most importantly, a stronger outer containment box and a system of high-pressure tubes that vent any gases directly out of the airplane. Another element is that the eight cells inside the redesigned battery box will be separated by more insulation than in the current design.
Boeing believes it can implement those and other new battery design elements quickly and can make it a permanent fix, to be incorporated on all subsequent Dreamliners.
Boeing engineers contend, and hope their tests will show, that their redesign will prevent a runaway battery fire.
It’s unclear if the FAA will be ready to move as swiftly as Boeing would like. Boeing is unlikely to get a full go-ahead at the meeting Friday.
Investigators at the National Transportation Safety Board, or NTSB, are still looking for the root cause of the two incidents that prompted the current crisis – a battery fire in a 787 on the ground in Boston in early January, followed just eight days later by a smoldering battery on a 787 flight in Japan. The FAA must take into account that investigation, which found that the battery fire in Boston was started by a short circuit in a single cell but hasn’t established what caused that short.
In the absence of knowing the root cause, said the person with knowledge of Boeing’s proposal, the jetmaker’s fix accounts for the possibility that a battery cell will overheat at some time in the future. The new battery design aims to ensure that if that happens, the airplane is safe.
Industry analysts have expressed skepticism that the FAA will readily approve a fix that focuses on containing an in-flight fire, rather than preventing one.
But the person familiar with Boeing’s fix insisted that “it’s not containment versus prevention. It’s containment and prevention.”
The idea is that venting off the airplane all the gas from an overheated cell will prevent an oxygen fire inside the battery. Meanwhile, the better thermal insulation between cells should prevent the heat from spreading through the battery and setting off adjacent cells.
Nonconference Men's Basketball Gonzaga Bulldogs (20-5) at No. 16 SMU Mustangs (20-3) Saturday, Feb. 13, 7 p.m. | Moody Coliseum, Dallas Watch: TV: ESPN2, Online: WatchESPN.com Outlook: Gonzaga has chance ...
jbOLYMPIA – To much of the public, the Legislature is either a place of high-minded policy debates or a refuge for political hacks doing the bidding of their donors. Few ...
She did it again. Ruth Berning, that goddess of everything that is considered fit to be consumed by the humble masses at Adult Day Health, has once again unknowingly invaded ...
A reader questioned my use of the latter in today's Slice. I'll write him back. But I don't think there is anything I can add to the exhaustive back-and-forth on ...