January 7, 2013 in Letters, Opinion

Gun defense is imbalanced


Every day, it seems, we hear the excuse from the gun lobby that law-abiding citizens should not be denied assault-style weapons with high-capacity magazines. The point being that law-abiding people are safe to own these weapons, and they should only be denied to the mentally unbalanced.

The problem is: How do we tell you apart? When you suggest a reasonable restriction on the number of bullets allowed in a magazine, and the response you get is, “You can take my gun from my cold dead hands because I need an assault rifle so someday I can attack the government in some kind of made-up revolution,” it seems like, perhaps, you are mentally ill. How can anyone take you seriously when an otherwise normal, sane, fairly reasonable person believes in this absurd nonsense?

If law-abiding gun owners want to be taken seriously, they need to tone down the rhetoric and stick to the facts. No one is trying to take away your gun; we simply want to try to limit the amount of damage a single disturbed person may inflict. Threatening violence unless you get your way is just another form of terrorism.

Ed Guise


Get stories like this in a free daily email

Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus