Idaho Republican Party leaders want state legislators to wade into city affairs and invalidate local laws that ban discrimination based on sexual orientation such as the one Coeur d’Alene passed after an emotional community debate two weeks ago.
Six Idaho cities have passed nondiscrimination ordinances in the past year and a half, and a seventh, Idaho Falls, is looking into one now. The Idaho GOP wants the efforts stopped.
“It’s a way for the people to make their expressions known to the Legislature,” Idaho Republican Chairman Barry Peterson said. “We let ’em know that this is the way that the majority of the party feels.”
About 81 percent of Idaho’s state lawmakers are Republican.
Coeur d’Alene Mayor Sandi Bloem noted rifts within the GOP.
“The Republican Party itself appears to be somewhat fractured, so I’m not assuming that it would get full Republican support,” she said. “I would assume that there would certainly be some that would recognize the local rights.”
The Coeur d’Alene City Council passed the ordinance on a 5-1 vote.
Cornel Rasor, a former Bonner County commissioner and chairman of the Idaho GOP’s resolutions committee, said, “I’d hire a gay guy if I thought he was a good worker. But if he comes into work in a tutu … he’s not producing what I want in my office.”
Rasor presented the resolution on behalf of a constituent in Bonner County; another was proposed by Idaho County’s GOP central committee. The two were combined and approved at the GOP central committee’s summer meeting last weekend in McCall with little debate.
“Resolved, that the Idaho Republican State Central Committee recommends that our legislators support Idaho’s current anti-discrimination laws and policies and enact a law that would make unenforceable any municipal ordinances that would seek to expand categories of prohibited discrimination beyond current state anti-discrimination laws and policies,” the resolution states.
The Idaho Human Rights Act now bans discrimination in housing, employment and public accommodations on the basis of race, religion, disability and more. But lawmakers have resisted efforts to add sexual orientation and gender identity to that law.
“If a guy has a particular predilection and keeps it to himself, that’s fine,” Rasor said. “But if he wants to use my business as a platform for his lifestyle, why should I have to subsidize that? And that’s what these anti-discrimination laws do.”
Tony Stewart, a founding member of the Kootenai County Task Force on Human Relations who pushed for Coeur d’Alene’s ordinance, disagreed.
“If the Legislature was to pass a law in Idaho voiding all of those cities’ ordinances, they would be sending a nationwide message that the LGBT community is really not welcome in Idaho and they can be discriminated against in jobs and housing,” Stewart said. “It would be a disastrous message.”
Because Idaho has no statewide law banning such discrimination, Idahoans can now legally be fired from their jobs, evicted from their homes or denied service in a restaurant solely because they’re gay.
Stewart cited a case in Lewiston in which a man died, and the newspaper obituary named his live-in partner as his survivor. “And that day he got fired,” he said. “So here’s a man, a law-abiding citizen grieving over the loss of his partner, and also got fired the same day. When you deal with jobs and housing and all, kicking people to the curb and saying somehow you’re unacceptable, that’s what they’re really saying. It reminds me so much of segregation in the South.”
Rasor said, “All I see is more and more laws making things more and more difficult, more and more restrictive, more and more controlled, and I’m a liberty person. I like to be left alone. I like to make my own decision.”
Peterson said, “Personally I don’t know anybody that’s been discriminated against on any of those issues, so I do not feel like a law should have to compel me to do something that I’m already willing to do. … You take away from somebody their opportunity to make a choice, to make a decision, to me that’s a serious impact upon liberty and freedom.”
Sandpoint was the first Idaho city to enact a local anti-discrimination ordinance covering sexual orientation and gender identity in December 2011; Boise, Ketchum, Moscow, Coeur d’Alene and Pocatello followed.
Idaho lawmakers have rejected a statewide law making that change each year for the past seven years.
There are 48 comments on this story »