June 26, 2013 in Nation/World

Supreme Court ruling bolsters private property rights

Los Angeles Times
 

WASHINGTON – In a decision bolstering private property rights, the Supreme Court ruled that a Florida landowner could sue a local government agency for denying him a building permit because he refused to pay for improvements on public property several miles away.

The 5-4 decision expanded the ability of property owners to claim that government requirements attached to land-use permits amount to an improper “taking” under the Constitution. The Fifth Amendment says private property cannot be taken for public use without “just compensation.”

In the case of Koontz vs. St. John’s Water Management District, the court said a government demand for money could constitute a taking of property. And the court said a landowner could make that argument even if nothing were taken because the permit was denied.

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus