Letters to the Editor

Defense cuts are needed

While odds are that we will sacrifice our women, children, elderly and infirm first, the budget sequester holds the faint possibility of reducing our second-most sacred cow: our bloated military budget.

Dollar for dollar, military expenditures create the fewest jobs or useful products, yet take the largest piece of the pie, and are fiercely defended by every congressperson because each district enjoys the largess of a fat contractor and/or a fat base; barrels of pork to grease the rails of the money train.

Washington’s sacred cows include Boeing Co., Fairchild Air Force Base and Joint Base Lewis-McChord, to name a few.

Each has value to someone, no doubt, but do we really need a military budget equal to or larger than rest of the world’s military budgets combined? A budget supporting more than 800 overseas bases? A budget larger than it took to win World War II? By sacrificing our most vulnerable, exactly whom are we defending?

Oh yes, our most sacred cow? I’d tell, but not after what that lobby has recently done to war hero and Secretary of Defense nominee former Sen. Chuck Hagel.

Michael Poulin

Spokane



Want to respond? Submit your own letter to the editor »

There are 53 comments on this story »


Sections


Profile

Contact the Spokesman

Main switchboard:
(509) 459-5000
Customer service:
(800) 338-8801
Newsroom:
(509) 459-5400
(800) 789-0029