October 10, 2013 in Business

Men’s Wearhouse rejects bid from Jos. A. Banks

Anne D’Innocenzio Associated Press
 
Deal doesn’t fit

Getting the brush-off: Jos. A. Bank proposed to acquire its bigger rival Men’s Wearhouse in a $2.3 billion deal that could create a men’s wear juggernaut with almost 2,000 stores. But the leaders at Men’s Wearhouse rejected the offer only hours after the proposal was publicly disclosed.

The details behind the proposal: Jos. A. Bank Clothiers said that it had made the unsolicited proposal in September to buy Men’s Wearhouse for $48 per share in cash, a 42 percent premium at the time.

Reasons for the rejection: Men’s Wearhouse says the deal would subject the company to “unacceptable risks and contingencies and would deprive our shareholders of the value inherent in Men’s Wearhouse for inadequate consideration.”

Associated Press

NEW YORK – Nothing like getting the brush-off.

Jos. A. Bank proposed to acquire its bigger rival Men’s Wearhouse in a $2.3 billion deal that would create a men’s wear juggernaut with close to 2,000 stores.

But the leaders at Men’s Wearhouse rejected the offer about two hours after it was publicly disclosed, calling it “opportunistic” and “inadequate.”

It later announced it would adopt a shareholder rights plan, also known as a poison pill, designed to thwart anyone who buys a big chunk of its stock without board approval: 10 percent for a person or group, or 15 percent for a passive institutional investor.

Jos. A. Bank Clothiers disclosed Wednesday that it made the unsolicited proposal in September to buy Men’s Wearhouse for $48 per share in cash, a 42 percent premium at the time. In rejecting the deal, Men’s Wearhouse said it wasn’t in the best interest of its shareholders or the company.

The proposal “significantly undervalues Men’s Wearhouse and fails to reflect the company’s growth strategy and upside potential,” Bill Sechrest, Men’s Wearhouse’s lead director of the board, said in a release.

Sechrest noted that a challenging second quarter led to a 12 percent decline in Men’s Wearhouse’s stock price, which the company believes doesn’t fairly reflect the “intrinsic” value of the shares.

Jos. A. Bank said late Wednesday that it would continue to push for a deal and called the rejection “inexplicable.”

Shares in Men’s Wearhouse climbed $9.79, or 28 percent, to $45.03 after rising as high as $45.56 earlier in the day, their highest level since February 2007. They had been up 13 percent since the beginning of the year.

Jos. A. Bank’s shares rose $2.67, or 6.4 percent, to $44.33. The stock had been down 2.1 percent since the beginning of the year.

Men’s Wearhouse, which had revenue of $2.48 billion in the latest fiscal year, had a market value of $1.68 billion as of Tuesday’s close, according to research firm FactSet. Jos. A. Bank, which had revenue of $1.05 billion in the latest year, had a market value of $1.17 billion.

Shoppers at both companies have pulled back amid economic uncertainty. Jos. A. Bank’s fiscal second-quarter net income fell 39 percent as shoppers didn’t respond as well to some of the retailer’s marketing campaigns as they did a year ago, while Men’s Wearhouse’s fiscal second-quarter earnings fell 28 percent due to one-time charges and an early Easter that pushed prom tuxedo rentals earlier than usual. The chain also cut its full-year guidance.

In June, Men’s Wearhouse ousted its chairman George Zimmer.

© Copyright 2013 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Thoughts and opinions on this story? Click here to comment >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email