September 5, 2013 in Letters, Opinion

Half measures pointless

 

As President Barack Obama ponders a possible military strike against Syria, what are we talking about? Yes, a reported 1,300 people were killed by a chemical attack. But why does their suffering warrant such a response, and the suffering of the 100,000 people who have been killed by bombs, bullets and fire do not?

I think pronouncing one kind of killing worse than another seems childish. And a measured or limited response is just as dumb: “Since you killed some people, we’re going to kill some people.” Never mind the fact that the people getting killed rarely even know why. If we really believe something must be done, then it should be all or nothing.

Either take Syria and force peace on them, or stay out of it.

Devin Barber

Spokane

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus