More are employed now than before recession began in 2007
WASHINGTON – The slowly recovering U.S. job market has helped women rebound faster than men: They’ve now regained all the jobs they lost to the Great Recession. Men are still 2.1 million jobs short.
And the gender gap is expected to persist until the job market is much healthier.
To understand why, consider the kinds of jobs that are, and aren’t, being added.
Lower-wage industries, like retail, education, restaurants and hotels, have been hiring the fastest. Women are predominant in those areas. Men, by contrast, dominate sectors like construction and manufacturing, which have yet to recover millions of jobs lost in the recession.
“It’s a segregated labor market, and men and women do work in different industries, and even in different areas within industries,” said Heidi Hartmann, an economist and president of the Institute for Women’s Policy Research.
Economists have long known that the recession hit men the hardest. The August jobs report issued last week spotlighted the divergence:
The unemployment rate for women was 6.8 percent – nearly a full percentage point less than the 7.7 percent rate for men.
All told, 68 million women said they were employed last month. That topped the 67.97 million who had jobs when the recession began in December 2007, the government says.
Among men, 76.2 million were employed last month. That was down from 78.3 million in December 2007.
Since the recession officially ended in June 2009, education and health services have helped drive job growth: That sector added nearly 1.6 million jobs, the second-most of any category. And women gained nearly 1.1 million of them.
Women also make up more than half of the workforce in hotels and restaurants, which has produced the third-largest job gain of any industry.
Heidi Shierholz, an economist with the Economic Policy Institute, said the lackluster economy has limited the growth of good jobs – the kind traditionally held by men. Low-paying jobs, more typically held by women, have been growing instead.
The trend likely won’t reverse, she said, until economic growth picks up and unemployment falls significantly below August’s 7.2 percent. That might be two years away, Shierholz said.
“It’s not like women are fine now,” Shierholz said. “Women have been disproportionately in lower-quality jobs.”
Even though women’s employment has recovered faster than men’s, there are still more men with jobs than women. And more men than women have found work since the recession ended. Yet men still haven’t recovered all their losses because the cuts were so deep in sectors such as manufacturing and construction.
Female workers have regained their job losses in the recession even though they were hit hard by government budget cuts, especially by states and localities. Since the end of 2007, state and local governments have cut 689,000 jobs. In a report last year, the liberal Economic Policy Institute calculated that women accounted for 70 percent of those lost jobs.
Despite their overall job gains, the percentage of women working or seeking work has been dropping, just as for men. The so-called labor force participation rate for women – the percentage either working or looking for work – was 57.3 last month. That was down from 59.4 percent in December 2007.
For men, the participation rate has dropped to 69.5 percent from 73.1 percent.
Nonconference Men's Basketball Gonzaga Bulldogs (20-5) at No. 16 SMU Mustangs (20-3) Saturday, Feb. 13, 7 p.m. | Moody Coliseum, Dallas Watch: TV: ESPN2, Online: WatchESPN.com Outlook: Gonzaga has chance ...
jbOLYMPIA – To much of the public, the Legislature is either a place of high-minded policy debates or a refuge for political hacks doing the bidding of their donors. Few ...
She did it again. Ruth Berning, that goddess of everything that is considered fit to be consumed by the humble masses at Adult Day Health, has once again unknowingly invaded ...
A reader questioned my use of the latter in today's Slice. I'll write him back. But I don't think there is anything I can add to the exhaustive back-and-forth on ...