Arrow-right Camera

Pay oil transport premium

I completely agree with your April 13 editorial on oil train regulation. There is one item that you did not mention. On March 3, the Wall Street Journal had an article about rail transport of oil. It said that oil companies are paying a premium to transport their oil by rail because it gives them the flexibility of selling the oil wherever the highest price is being offered. Evidently, there are several pipeline projects on hold because of lack of interest by the oil companies.

It seems to me that if the oil companies are willing to pay a premium for this flexibility, the premium should include the cost of protecting the public and mitigation of traffic problems caused by additional oil trains.

Jerry McBride

Loon Lake, Wash.


Top stories in Opinion

Editorial: Washington state lawmakers scramble to keep public in the dark

State lawmakers want to create a legislative loophole in Washington’s Public Records Act. While it’s nice to see Democrats and Republicans working together for once, it’s just too bad that their agreement is that the public is the enemy. As The Spokesman-Review’s Olympia reporter Jim Camden explained Feb. 22, lawmakers could vote on a bill today responding to a court order that the people of Washington are entitled to review legislative records.