August 17, 2014 in City

Signs point to dim future for STA Plaza

Transit board member predicts hub will be forced to leave downtown
By The Spokesman-Review
 
File photo

Pressure is mounting on STA and the downtown business community over questions about the plaza.
(Full-size photo)

Map of this story's location

Spokane’s business community likely will succeed in pushing the region’s central bus plaza out of downtown, a former transit board chairman predicts.

“We were doing everything we could to appease the concerns about ‘problem behavior’ … and it was never enough,” said Spokane Valley City Councilman Chuck Hafner, who serves on the Spokane Transit Authority’s board of directors and chaired the panel in 2013. “This issue has been discussed for years and I finally had to tell the board that appeasement isn’t going to work because the downtown interests don’t want us there.”

Hafner, who worries that moving the plaza could cost taxpayers as much as $15 million, said he hopes a solution can be found over the next few months that would keep a viable transit hub in downtown Spokane.

“Hopefully there’s an answer,” he said, explaining he’s torn by the issue but supported last month’s controversial three-month delay of the plaza’s planned $5.8 million renovation as a “last gasp” attempt to work with critics. “As a representative of Spokane Valley, I have to remind them that this is a regional transit system and everyone has a stake in what happens next – not just downtown Spokane people.”

Hafner’s candid predictions come as political pressure begins to mount on STA and the downtown business community over questions about the plaza’s future.

Last week, for example, the Spokane City Council called for the delayed plaza renovation to proceed, a move that backers hope will send a clear signal to the STA board and business groups that the council wants it to remain centrally located downtown.

Council members also made support for the plaza’s current location a litmus-test question for the five finalists seeking appointment to a vacant council seat. All five said they support the existing location.

Spokane City Councilwoman Amber Waldref said she understands Hafner’s frustration, noting he invested a lot of time as chairman last year trying to find reasonable solutions.

Waldref, who replaced Hafner at the helm of the transit board this year, said her hope is that a newly formed task force will be able to identify options that can draw broad community support for keeping the plaza in place for at least the next decade. That would bring STA to the end of its latest long-term operating plan, which is built around the existing downtown plaza. The agency could include any major potential changes in downtown transit services as part of its next long-term plan, she said.

“I’m trying to stay positive,” Waldref said. “The reality is you’re always going to have a downtown (transit) presence … and I’m open to a conversation that includes whether we look at a restructuring of that system after 2025.”

Driving the uncertainty are two of Spokane’s most powerful business groups: Greater Spokane Incorporated and the Downtown Spokane Partnership.

Scaring away business

Both have complained extensively about the number of homeless people, mentally ill people, and drunk or stoned teenagers who hang out at the plaza, which they fear is harming the region’s economy by driving tourists and commerce out of Spokane’s central business and financial district. The Davenport Hotel has complained to STA executives and board members that it’s losing business because guests are uncomfortable walking to Riverfront Park and elsewhere downtown because they often must pass through unruly crowds loitering around the transit plaza.

The groups, with help from regional tourism promoter Visit Spokane, persuaded the Spokane Transit Authority board last month to delay until November a remodel of the plaza that had been planned for the past six years.

Downtown Spokane Partnership, a group that collects city-authorized assessments on downtown businesses and property owners to cover marketing and other business support services, is organizing the task force that’s studying options.

“There are folks who believe the plaza needs to be moved,” the group’s president, Mark Richard, acknowledged this week. “But that doesn’t mean that’s the position of the DSP or that … it’s the right or only position.”

Part of the task force’s focus will include whether improvements can be made as part of a remodel to discourage the plaza’s appeal as a place where those who aren’t waiting to catch a bus can hang out. Additionally, the task force will examine long-term options.

“We’re open to hearing what people have to say,” Richard said. “At the same time, I think there needs to be a recognition that when the plaza was built, I don’t think anyone intended that it would be a respite for the homeless and a place for loitering. It was intended to be a hub for transit.”

Complaints brought improvements

STA officials and others say most of the problems cited by business groups largely have been resolved during the past couple of years.

After removing the plaza’s dedicated smoking area in 2012 at the request of some business owners, STA spent $70,000 building a new one after smokers migrated to other nearby locations, including the block where GSI’s offices are located, prompting even more business complaints.

Spokane beefed up its police presence at the plaza, including the opening of a downtown precinct alongside the terminal’s north entrance, and the City Council adopted a controversial ordinance that made it illegal to sit or lie down on public sidewalks, which was intended to give officers a way to disrupt long-term loitering. In addition to targeting criminal behavior, the city and STA made efforts to bring in more social services for those who need it.

Ed Pace, another Spokane Valley City councilman who also serves on the STA board, said he shares Hafner’s frustrations over the potential cost of having to relocate a regional transit hub, adding that he’s asked unsuccessfully for a clear explanation of the “problem behaviors” that business interests want alleviated.

“No one can tell me what, specifically, those behaviors are,” Pace said. “How can we determine if we’re making any progress addressing these ‘problem behaviors’ if we don’t know what specifically we’re supposed to be addressing?”

Pace also wants to make sure that the task force created to study the issue makes an effort to include those who are engaged in the behaviors that the downtown business interests find so objectionable.

“That group of folks who hang out there need to be considered, too,” he said. “They’re citizens and should be part of that discussion.”


There are 200 comments on this story. Click here to view comments >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email