The issue of whether Washington’s football team should keep the name Redskins is needlessly complicated with diversions into debates about “political correctness.”
My high school, the Western Warriors in Las Vegas, adopted the Redskins fight song as our own. Here’s part of what we sang back in the 1970s:
“Scalp ’um, swamp ’um, we will take ’um big score.”
Would anyone today feel comfortable speaking to a Native American in this Tonto-like tongue? It’s so thoroughly degrading and cringe-inducing, even the Washington Redskins changed the words. Was that a bow to political correctness? No, it was an end to stupidity.
So why do that, and keep “Redskins?” We’re told it’s a nod to pride and tradition. But the history of that team is that its original owner, George Preston Marshall, was a bigot.
He moved the team from Boston (where it was originally called the Braves) and marketed it as the South’s team. Marshall was the last NFL owner to employ African American players. Shirley Povich, a sportswriter for the Washington Post, once wrote: “Jim Brown, born ineligible to play for the Redskins, integrated their end zone three times yesterday.”
Marshall reluctantly agreed to end his segregationist ways in exchange for the federal funds that financed the building of Robert F. Kennedy Stadium in 1961. This is all documented in “Showdown: JFK and the Integration of the Washington Redskins,” by Thomas G. Smith.
So it’s not such a leap to consider that “Redskins” was a slur from the beginning, and the tradition being upheld is rooted in bigotry.
More Demand. Nick Hanauer, a super-rich Seattleite and supporter of the $15 minimum wage, recently wrote an essay in Politico aimed at fellow American “zillionaires,” or those in the top 0.1 percent income bracket.
His basic message is that it’s in the interests of zillionaires to break up concentrations of wealth because it hurts demand, which hurts the economy. Or put his way, there’s only so many pairs of pants a rich guy can buy.
In case you hadn’t noticed, that rising tide that was to follow tax cuts for the rich hasn’t lifted all boats. However, the wealthy, for the most part, support policies that expand income inequality.
Hanauer’s response: “The most insidious thing about trickle-down economics isn’t believing that if the rich get richer, it’s good for the economy. It’s believing that if the poor get richer, it’s bad for the economy.”
Scandal! Imagine this scandal at an executive branch agency of the federal government:
The director refuses to turn over documents to a congressional panel. Congress finds her in contempt. She resigns. A top administrator misuses funds to help political allies and is sent to prison on a perjury conviction. More than 20 other employees are removed from the agency.
The Internal Revenue Service under President Obama? No, the Environmental Protection Agency under President Reagan. Ann Gorsuch Brown was the director. Rita Lavelle was the jailed administrator. The scandals involved money that was supposed to be used for Superfund cleanups.
Reagan’s two-term presidency is highly popular among conservatives, and it rates high among presidential scholars. But his two administrations also had the most people who were either investigated, indicted or convicted. A total of 138, according to Haynes Johnson, who wrote “Sleepwalking Through History: America in the Reagan Years.”
Bill Clinton, another popular president, was impeached. Shortly thereafter, he achieved his highest approval rating in office, 73 percent.
In fact, there were a lot more indicted officials in the Reagan and Clinton administrations than in the Bush and Obama ones. Maybe Americans like a good scandal. Or, more likely, they’ve tuned out political games that exaggerate them.
House kills completers scholarship bill, amends SB 1195, and sends SB 1206 for committee hearing, starting now…
Moving at lightning speed, the House has sent HB 190a, the adult completers scholarship bill, back to the House Education Committee, killing it for the session; referred SB 1206, the ...
Senate OKs transportation funding bill
Sen. Shawn Keough, R-Sandpoint, speaks against SB 1206, the transportation funding bill, in the Idaho Senate debate on Tuesday. Story here. (Betsy Z. Russell) The Senate has voted 19-16 in ...
Spokane’s worst roads: Find out how your street ranks
When venturing outside in the aftermath of winter, notice the fresh crop of tire-eating potholes marring city streets. Griping about Spokane’s pavement is a topic that can unite newcomers, lifelong ...
Be aware of bears emerging from dens
WILDLIFE WATCHING – Re-think your bird feeder placement and secure the garbage. Black bears and grizzly bears have started leaving their dens as spring weather has taken hold in the ...