March 1, 2014 in Washington Voices

Transfer station prices could go up if Spokane Valley doesn’t join regional system

By The Spokesman-Review
 
Tyler Tjomsland photoBuy this photo

Todd Harris tosses trash out of the bed of his pickup on Thursday at the Spokane Valley Transfer Station. If the Spokane Valley City Council pulls out of the regional solid waste system, the cost for self-hauling of garbage, hazardous waste and yard debris may rise for residents to reflect the true costs of the service.
(Full-size photo)

Map of this story's location

Spokane Valley residents who carry their own garbage to the Spokane Valley transfer station on North Sullivan Road could face higher charges if their city decides to pull out of the county’s new regional solid waste system.

At a meeting Thursday night, Spokane County Commissioners said the current rates for self-hauling are subsidized by fees on regular garbage collection countywide.

But if the Spokane Valley City Council pulls out of the regional system, the cost for self-hauling of garbage, hazardous waste and yard debris may rise for that city’s residents to reflect the true costs of the service.

Spokane Valley City Councilman Arne Woodard objected, calling the prospective charges “intimidation and threats.”

He was told that talk of higher fees is not a threat, just fiscal reality.

County commissioners earlier this month concluded an agreement with the city of Spokane to take over the regional solid waste system on Nov. 18, including the Valley and North Side transfer stations.

Spokane City Hall would continue to have control over the waste-to-energy plant and transfer station at 2900 S. Geiger Blvd.

The agreement offers participating cities more influence over garbage policy. It also calls for the regional system to continue sending garbage to the incinerator for at least three years to maintain income for the incinerator and regional system.

The city in turn has guaranteed to maintain its current gate fee of $103 with future increases tied to the consumer price index.

County commissioners are looking to Spokane Valley, Airway Heights, Medical Lake, Deer Park, Millwood and other small cities to join to keep the system’s revenues strong without big changes or cost increases for residents.

So far, the smaller cities have been dragging their feet on making decisions despite a Nov. 17 deadline. The only exception is Cheney, which is moving to establish its own system.

Woodard explained that he wants more financial analysis on what it would cost Spokane Valley residents.

Spokane Valley Mayor Dean Grafos said he wants garbage disposal put out for bid so that a long-haul option could be compared with the cost of incinerator disposal. Commissioners said they plan to do that within three years.

A consultant study issued last year showed that the cost of long haul would likely be more expensive.

Breakaway cities would have to write their own detailed solid waste plans under oversight from the state and maintain at least the same level of service being provided now.

There was almost no discussion about environmental risks posed by people dumping hazardous waste or used oil on the ground over the Spokane aquifer to avoid potential new charges at the Valley transfer station for what has been a free service for 23 years. There was also no discussion of how higher fees for self-hauling might result in more illegal dumping or accumulation of residential garbage.

Jim Wavada, environmental planner for the state Department of Ecology, said writing individual solid waste plans could cost $200,000 and take months to complete.

“My encouragement to all of the jurisdictions is to make your decision this month,” he said.

Several of the small city leaders objected to a portion of the county’s deal with Spokane that sets a value on the Valley and North Side transfer stations, which are being transferred to county control as part of the new regional system.

The city agreed to turn over the transfer stations at no cost in exchange for delivery of garbage to the incinerator for seven years, but it would cost a little more than $1 million a year to pull out of the deal early.

Commissioner Shelly O’Quinn said, “We are interested in what is best for the citizens of Spokane Valley.”

Commissioners stressed that maintaining a regional system has advantages in terms of negotiating power and economies of scale that may not be found by breaking away.

Currently, Seattle is the only city in the state not participating in a countywide solid waste plan.

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus