Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Knox conviction ‘not justice,’ defense tells Italian high court

American Amanda Knox’s Italian ex-boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito, right, arrives at Italy’s highest court building Wednesday in Rome. (Associated Press)
Colleen Barry Associated Press

ROME – Amanda Knox’s defense lawyer urged Italy’s highest court on Wednesday to overturn the American’s conviction in the 2007 murder of her British roommate, calling it a “grave judicial error.”

Knox faces 28 1/2 years in an Italian jail for the 2007 murder of 21-year-old Meredith Kercher in an apartment they shared in the university town of Perugia, after being convicted by a Florence appeals court last year along with her former Italian boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito.

Sollecito’s defense will make its case Friday, when the case resumes before the Court of Cassation.

Winding up Wednesday’s full day of arguments, Knox defense lawyer Carlo Dalla Vedova said the Florence court’s conviction of Knox “is not justice, it is a distortion of the facts.”

He argued that based on analysis of bloodstains, including two handprints on the victim’s pillow, in Kercher’s room and elsewhere in the house the two women shared, “there is not one trace of Amanda in the room of the crime.”

“We are confronted with a very grave judicial error that must be set right,” he said before asking the court to overturn the 2014 guilty verdict.

Knox maintains her innocence. She returned to the United States in 2011 after an earlier appellate court verdict acquitted the pair. She was awaiting the high court’s decision in her hometown of Seattle, and is “worried, very worried,” Dalla Vedova said.

“I don’t think she is sleeping much,” he added.

Sollecito spent the day in court, joined by family members and supporters. Defendants are not permitted to address the high court. He remains free but his passport was seized after the Florence court sentenced him to 25 years.

The Cassation Court’s options include confirming the guilty verdicts, raising the question of extradition for Knox; overturning the convictions and ordering a third appeals trial; or overturning the convictions without a new trial, tantamount to acquittal.