Arrow-right Camera
Opinion >  Letters

I-732 study biased

Debate is a central part of democracy, but voters deserve to get the facts. In a September 24 op-ed opposing Initiative 732, the authors fail to present the facts when they cite an economic analysis that was supposedly issued in August.

First, voters should know that the analysis was paid for by the No on 732 campaign. Kaiser Aluminum, whose senior HR manager co-authored the op-ed, is the largest donor to the No campaign. Second, the analysis was never actually issued. Only an executive summary and an infographic have been released. Third, the analysis of electricity costs is wildly inaccurate. A nationally recognized expert on the electricity sector calls it “implausible.”

Here’s the truth: I-732 puts a price on dirty fossil fuels, and it offsets the costs to households and businesses by reducing our regressive sales tax by a full point, eliminating the B&O tax on manufacturing, and funding a Working Families Rebate that will provide up to $1,500 a year for 460,000 low-income households.

We should pass I-732 for the sake of our children and grandchildren. Kaiser Aluminum may not agree with that, but they should still agree that voters deserve accurate information so they can make informed decisions.

Yoram Bauman, co-chair, Yeson732.org

Seattle


 

Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters of no more than 200 words on topics of public interest. Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. We accept no more than one letter a month from the same writer. Please remember to include your daytime phone number and street address. The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Send letters to:
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201

Email: editor@spokesman.com
Fax: (509) 459-3815
Questions?: (509) 459-5430