PULLMAN – Not unlike many of his peers, Ernie Kent is eager to see college basketball change for the better. But the Washington State coach is also among a small percentile of college basketball coaches with a platform significant enough to affect such reform.
In 2001, Kent, then the coach at Oregon, was appointed to the National Association of Basketball Coaches’ (NABC) board of directors. Seventeen years later, he’s still one of 23 active members on a board that Condoleezza Rice’s NCAA task force turned to last December for advice on how to fix college basketball in the wake of the sport’s wide-scale FBI investigation.
Following the Cougars’ game at UTEP, Kent flew to Charlotte, North Carolina, to meet with Rice and other members of the task force to opine on changes needed in the sport. Kent, Kansas coach Bill Self and NABC Executive Director/ex-Oregon coach Jim Haney fielded “tough questions” from Rice’s committee, said Kent, and gave their thoughts on the subjects presented by Rice in the recent Commission on College Basketball report.
Rice’s panel has also enlisted opinions from a variety of other groups, including the NBA.
“I fully support the commission to help redirect college basketball,” Kent said Wednesday. “Although more work needs to be done, we’re moving in the right direction to bring about change in our sport. … In general, the whole direction of college basketball needing to change is positive. I appreciate the work Dr. Rice and her group has done because they’ve done an outstanding job.”
In a statement issued by the Pac-12, commissioner Larry Scott said many of the commission’s intentions reflect those held by the conference. Federal investigations didn’t merely touch the Pac-12, but two of its programs – USC and Arizona – were buried underneath allegations made against two assistant coaches, one from each program. Both were fired and a season-long suspension was levied against one of the players involved, USC’s De’Anthony Melton.
“We are particularly pleased that many of the Rice Commission’s recommendations parallel those of the Pac-12 task force, which were unanimously embraced by our Conference’s 12 presidents and chancellors in March,” Scott said. “We look forward to working with the NCAA and our members to evaluate and implement the recommendations.”
One of the chief issues presented in Rice’s report is college basketball’s heavily-scrutinized one-and-done rule. Kent’s glad the group has placed a microscope on the rule, which, in order to abolish as per the committee’s recommendation, would also require cooperation from the NBA.
“There’s feeling that the one and done will eliminate a lot of the problems that go on with college basketball in terms of the recruiting piece of it,” Kent said. “That elite level of athlete like that when you talk about agents and runners and all those people that are involved with an elite athlete. So that’s not a bad thing, that’s a good thing.”
The more wide-ranging topic of student-athlete stipends and scholarships will impact the NCAA beyond college basketball. Kent is unsure how that would manifest itself if change did take place, but believes it’s also an issue worth examining.
“That’s something that would go across the board,” he said. “That’s something for everybody and you talk about doing that for all college athletes. That’s a big number, so I don’t know about all of that.”
Subscribe to The Spokesman-Review’s sports newsletter
Get the day’s top sports headlines and breaking news delivered to your inbox by subscribing here.