Arrow-right Camera
Opinion

Washington vs. Idaho wildlife

The management principles of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Idaho Department of Fish and Game are opposite.

WDFW employs a variety of methods to scare or remove and relocate wildlife, to avoid conflict with people. (“Idaho agency kills cougar that delayed a flight” Spokesman-Review, Jan. 25)

IDFG does not typically relocate large predators that become accustomed to being near people (as stated by Mike McDonald, the department’s regional wildlife manager). An Idaho conservation officer shot and killed the cougar while it was being chased toward a fenced-off area around the control tower. The so called “conservation officer” did not have access to a tranquilizer gun. The cougar was less than a year old.

By the same token, Idaho doesn’t need to change trapping regulations to protect incidental capture of Canada Lynx. (Spokesman-Review, Jan. 26)

This agency, entrusted with stewardship of our wildlife, is forfeiting the essence of its mandate to conserve, protect and enhance the future of our wildlife.

Cecilia Nolthenius

Coeur d’Alene


 

Top stories in Opinion

Editorial: Washington state lawmakers scramble to keep public in the dark

State lawmakers want to create a legislative loophole in Washington’s Public Records Act. While it’s nice to see Democrats and Republicans working together for once, it’s just too bad that their agreement is that the public is the enemy. As The Spokesman-Review’s Olympia reporter Jim Camden explained Feb. 22, lawmakers could vote on a bill today responding to a court order that the people of Washington are entitled to review legislative records.