Arrow-right Camera
Opinion >  Letters

Washington vs. Idaho wildlife

The management principles of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Idaho Department of Fish and Game are opposite.

WDFW employs a variety of methods to scare or remove and relocate wildlife, to avoid conflict with people. (“Idaho agency kills cougar that delayed a flight” Spokesman-Review, Jan. 25)

IDFG does not typically relocate large predators that become accustomed to being near people (as stated by Mike McDonald, the department’s regional wildlife manager). An Idaho conservation officer shot and killed the cougar while it was being chased toward a fenced-off area around the control tower. The so called “conservation officer” did not have access to a tranquilizer gun. The cougar was less than a year old.

By the same token, Idaho doesn’t need to change trapping regulations to protect incidental capture of Canada Lynx. (Spokesman-Review, Jan. 26)

This agency, entrusted with stewardship of our wildlife, is forfeiting the essence of its mandate to conserve, protect and enhance the future of our wildlife.

Cecilia Nolthenius

Coeur d’Alene


 

Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters of no more than 200 words on topics of public interest. Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. We accept no more than one letter a month from the same writer. Please remember to include your daytime phone number and street address. The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Send letters to:
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201

Email: editor@spokesman.com
Fax: (509) 459-3815
Questions?: (509) 459-5430