Arrow-right Camera
Opinion >  Letters

Farm Bill critical

Farmer Michele Kiesz should not “gloat … about the condition of her ‘CRP’” if it is truly a weedy hill, as described in Nicholas Deshais’ article, “Drained: Deeper wells are only a temporary fix, so plans to tap into the Columbia River are underway” (May 27, 2018).

As the article goes on to explain, the purpose of the Conservation Reserve Program, along with other U.S. Department of Agriculture conservation programs, is “to remove environmentally sensitive land from agricultural production and plant species that will improve environmental health and quality.” These species are not weeds. Often they are native grasses, wildflowers and shrubs that restore soil and water and protect wildlife. Some of the state’s most vulnerable wildlife species, such as greater sage-grouse, pygmy rabbit and bull trout, might have disappeared without our farmers’ and ranchers’ participation in these programs.

Reauthorization of the Farm Bill is currently being considered by Congress. Washington is seeking increased funding for CRP and other agriculture conservation programs in the new bill. As our state becomes more populous, these programs become more critical to the health of our environment, including water preservation.

Kim Thorburn

Spokane


 

Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters of no more than 200 words on topics of public interest. Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. We accept no more than one letter a month from the same writer. Please remember to include your daytime phone number and street address. The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Send letters to:
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201

Email: editor@spokesman.com
Fax: (509) 459-3815
Questions?: (509) 459-5430