Arrow-right Camera

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Sunday, April 21, 2019  Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Clear Night 50° Clear
News >  Washington

UW to pay $127,000 in legal fees in settlement with College Republicans over free speech

Hundreds protest outside the Feb. 10 Patriot Prayer rally, held by UW College Republicans at the University of Washington in Seattle. (Courtney Pedroza / Seattle Times)
Hundreds protest outside the Feb. 10 Patriot Prayer rally, held by UW College Republicans at the University of Washington in Seattle. (Courtney Pedroza / Seattle Times)
By Katherine Long Seattle Times

The University of Washington has settled a lawsuit with the UW College Republicans club over $17,000 in security fees the university planned to charge the club for holding a rally Feb. 10 with the conservative group Patriot Prayer.

The College Republicans argued that the security fee unconstitutionally infringed upon their First Amendment freedom of speech rights by making it unaffordable for them to host events that could lead to violent protests.

Under the terms of the settlement, the UW will pay $127,000 in legal fees to the College Republicans’ attorneys. The UW will also rescind its policy around security for student group events and not charge any groups a security fee for speakers, unless the group specifically asks for security to be present. The settlement, however, does not preclude the university from “creating a constitutionally permissible security fee for student events.”

“The University of Washington strongly supports a free and open exchange of opinions and ideas,” university spokesman Victor Balta said. “We have a responsibility to our campus community to ensure that safety and security are maintained during any event held on campus, and we are pleased that the settlement preserves our ability to develop a long-term solution that balances free speech and campus safety without passing the burden of sometimes significant security costs on to all students.”

Twenty-three law school professors signed a letter earlier this year asking UW President Ana Mari Cauce to settle the case, saying that assessing substantial fees to a student group could have the effect of squelching unpopular views, and runs counter to the First Amendment.

In their lawsuit, the College Republicans argued that they and other politically conservative campus groups were being discriminated against when the UW charged “exorbitant event fees to provide increased security needed to thwart violent protests from leftwing political activists,” according to a statement by Freedom X, a California nonprofit law and advocacy firm that defended the club.

According to the settlement, UW will pay Freedom X $115,000 and the Seattle law firm Ellis, Li & McKinstry $7,500.

The UW never collected the $17,000 fee. The day before the rally, U.S. District Court Judge Marsha Pechman issued a temporary restraining order, blocking the UW from levying the fee. Pechman said that the guidelines of how the bill was calculated ran afoul of the First Amendment, and could have the effect of chilling speech.

During the Feb. 10 rally, both Patriot Prayer supporters and counter-protesters clashed repeatedly, and several people were arrested.

The law school professors wrote that the UW’s security fee was calculated based on the fact that Joey Gibson, the leader of Patriot Prayer, had been assaulted at previous rallies and threatened with death. “The fact that Mr. Gibson had, because of his actual or perceived views, been the victim of prior criminal attacks and threats is a particularly unseemly basis for charging a student group for the cost of protecting him while on campus,” they wrote.

The professors wrote that few student clubs would be able to raise $17,000 for an event, and that “the financial risk posed by potential fees of that magnitude would doubtless deter at least most student organizations from inviting a speaker likely to attract a hostile crowd.”

They underscored that they were not writing in favor of rescinding the fees because they agreed with Gibson. “The protections of the First Amendment are not limited to liberals, or conservatives, or people with good ideas,” they wrote.

Subscribe to the Morning Review newsletter

Get the day’s top headlines delivered to your inbox every morning by subscribing to our newsletter.

You have been successfully subscribed!
There was a problem subscribing you to the newsletter. Double check your email and try again, or email