Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Carolyn Hax: Pregnant and feeling guilty because sister can’t have children

Washington Post

Dear Carolyn: My husband and I are expecting our first child in January. We are thrilled about this and are excited to be parents.

I am struggling because I have a sister seven years older who cannot have children. Whenever I get excited about the upcoming birth, my mother is quick to remind me my sister will never have this experience. I’ve tried hiding my feelings around them because I want to be sympathetic, but I also don’t want to feel guilty for how I feel. It has gotten to the point where I don’t even want to include them in the baby shower.

How can I acknowledge their feelings but still enjoy this time in my life? – Feeling Guilty for Being Pregnant

Wait – “around them”? And “their feelings”?

If you meant your sister’s feelings, then that’s understandable (with sympathy, not guilt) – and if your mother issues these quick reminders because your sister is nearby and still grieving and you’re missing signals that your sister is losing her composure, then that’s understandable, too.

But if you meant that exactly as you wrote it, that your sister’s feelings and your mother’s are one and the same; and neither of them is able to feel your joy through the weight of your sister’s misfortune; and you feel guilt for healthy pleasures; then there’s more here than a childlessness story. There’s also a story of a mother overinvolved and overinvested in one daughter’s emotional life – plainly at the expense of the other’s.

Where is your mother’s joy and excitement at your pregnancy?

Life is complicated, humans are complicated. We’re equipped to hold contradictory thoughts and feelings. Happy anticipation of one child’s future can – and does, every day – coexist with sadness about another’s.

Some situations interfere with that ability, like depression or trauma. That’s why your sister herself gets 90 percent of a pass on this, with the 10 percent reserved for common sisterly courtesy. Such as: “I’m genuinely happy for you, and sorry I’m in such a bad way right now that I can’t properly show it.”

But, again, when there’s no apparent boundary between one family member’s feelings and another’s, and when the entire family is expected to live and talk and feel utterly in service of an Alpha Feeler, then it’s time to start reading up on codependency.

Better yet: Since your family of origin gives off that burned-rubber smell of dysfunction, and since you’re at Stage 2 of spinning off into a family of origin for a child, it might behoove you to talk through this guilt you’re feeling with a skilled family therapist. The better grasp you have of the history that brought you to this moment, the less likely you’ll be to repeat it.

And hey – congratulations. I’m really happy for you.

Dear Carolyn: My ex pays $400 a month in child support for our sons, but neither of us pays alimony. I work a full-time job that covers my mortgage and household bills. I also work a part-time job on weekends, when our sons are with my ex, so I can afford some extras for us.

My ex lives with his girlfriend and pays all their expenses because she lost her job. He’s behind on child support, so I asked for a partial payment to use on school supplies. My ex-mother-in-law told people I know that I’m greedy.

My crime? I get my nails done on a regular basis, and I buy my morning coffee.

Carolyn, I’ve cut back on many expenses, but the nail salon and coffee habit are paid for with money from my part-time job. So is my mother-in-law correct? – Hardworking Momma

Yes, because what your mother-in-law is actually telling people you know is that she’s vindictive and petty. Which sounds dead on from here.

At least, I hope that’s the message people are hearing between her lines.

But what she says and others think is beyond your control, so let’s just talk about your part of it.

You have a deal with your ex: You have primary custody (yes?) so your ex-husband pays you child support. This is pretty basic stuff. He pays extra, you rear extra.

The rest – your grooming and his relationship – is each of yours to manage separately. As long as you both meet your obligations, there’s nothing more here to say.

The one not meeting an obligation at the moment is your ex – so, in fact, your letting him partway off the hook in his girlfriend’s time of need is an act of generosity, not greed.

Or appears so to me, possibly because I’m not your ex’s mommy.

I’m sorry she took the low road. As it always does, it hurts her more than it does anyone else, so have this ready for her or her son or for anyone else who reports her smears to you – “I’m sorry to hear that” – and have nothing further to say.

Email Carolyn at tellme@washpost.com.