Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Miss Manners: Separate checks at longstanding lunch

By Judith Martin, Nicholas Ivor Martin and Jacobina Martin Andrews McMeel Syndication

DEAR MISS MANNERS: My friends and I, all professionals, have been meeting periodically for lunch for over 20 years. From the beginning, we split the bill four ways.

Perhaps the assumption was that it would all even out over time, but it has not. There are clear subsidizers and subsidizees. (Yes, I am a subsidizer.) Occasionally, a subsidizee will contribute a few extra dollars. Otherwise, we continue to split the bill evenly. No one complains and no one is trying to take advantage. We all enjoy each other’s company very much.

Unexpectedly, at the end of a recent lunch, our waitress cheerfully asked if we would like separate checks. I responded, “Yes, please.” My friend, who styles himself as The Nicest Guy You Know, chastised me, saying that separate checks would place an extra burden on the waitress.

I replied that she would not have offered if that were so. (The restaurant was not particularly busy.) The waitress left and returned shortly with four checks.

I must ask that Miss Manners assume that my friend’s motivation was solely concern for the waitress. Was he nevertheless being overprotective, or was I inconsiderate, as he claims?

GENTLE READER: If the waitress is offering to perform a service – one that is much needed – why would you not graciously take her up on it?

It is probably not convenient for her to write down numerous food substitutions either, but she does it. Or the restaurant will take a stand against it and clearly state so.

Miss Manners suggests that you assume the same for this situation. Unless there is a policy against it, it is probably far less annoying to give you separate checks –computers are so handy for things like this – than it is for her to sit and wait while everyone squabbles over who had the main course chopped salad and who only had it as a side.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: Sadly, my fiance’s father passed away last week. Despite having told his grown children that my fiance’s ex-wife should not come to the funeral, she showed up anyway.

Before his father’s dementia got to the point that he didn’t know people, he wanted nothing to do with this woman, and she was not welcome in his home. My fiance’s oldest sister had stayed friendly with her, and in the last two years has invited her to visit, despite knowing how her father felt.

In the 10-plus years since their divorce, my fiance has sacrificed going to grandchildren’s birthday parties in order to avoid her. Am I wrong for being upset that both my fiance and his father have been so blatantly disrespected?

GENTLE READER: Not wrong, just too late. If the ex-wife has already attended the funeral, Miss Manners does not foresee you getting much satisfaction out of being upset in the aftermath.

If your fiance’s relationship with his sister is not such that he can ask her to help him with an uncomfortable situation, then proceeding as you have – avoiding the ex-wife as best you can – seems to be the only recourse. The fact that you will be soon replacing her should be of mild consolation.

Please send your questions to Miss Manners at her website, www.missmanners.com.