Latest from The Spokesman-Review

• Oreskovich’s motion not to admit AMR report

  May 30, 2010 in City Defense attorney Carl Oreskovich’s motion to not allow in Spokane police Officer Karl Thompson’s June 7 criminal trial an American Medical Response report from the night of Otto Zehm’s confrontation …

• Ruling of no conflict in Karl Thompson’s defense

  May 25, 2010 in City U.S. District Court Judge Philip M. Pro’s ruling of no conflict of interest in Carl Oreskovich’s representation of Spokane police Officer Karl F. Thompson in the Otto Zehm criminal case …

• Zehm: Response to defense counsel conflict

  May 24, 2010 in City Read the argument responding to the federal prosecutor’s claim that a conflict of interest exists with how Carl Oreskovich was hired by the city of Spokane to defend Officer Karl …

• Zehm: Defense counsel conflict

  May 24, 2010 in City Read the court filing, detailing why the federal prosecutor believes a conflict of interest exists with how Carl Oreskovich was hired by the city of Spokane to defend Officer Karl …

• Motion to dismiss Stevens County prosecuting attorney

  May 18, 2010 in City An affidavit filed by defense attorney Carl Oreskovich in support of his request to dismiss Stevens County Prosecuting Attorney Timothy D. Rasmussen in the case of Spokane firefighter Todd Chism.

• City increased pay authorization for Carl Oreskovich

  June 24, 2009 in City May 14, 2009, Spokane City Council resolution authorizing an increase in money set aside to pay attorney Carl Oreskovich for his representation in the lawsuit filed by the family of …

• City payment authorization for Carl Oreskovich

  June 23, 2009 in City Oct. 20, 2008, Spokane City Council resolution on using attorney Carl Oreskovich as special counsel in the civil lawsuit brought by the family of Otto Zehm.

• Carl Oreskovich billing in Zehm suit

  June 23, 2009 in City Attorney Carl Oreskovich’s billing to the city of Spokane for his services in the civil lawsuit brought by the family of Otto Zehm.