Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Partly Cloudy Night 31° Partly Cloudy

Eye On Boise

Dems try for vote on family-planning bill for women in the gap, but House refuses

The domed ceiling over the Idaho House chamber (The Spokesman-Review / Betsy Z. Russell)
The domed ceiling over the Idaho House chamber (The Spokesman-Review / Betsy Z. Russell)

House Democrats mounted a final effort to do something for at least some of those who fall into Idaho’s health coverage gap today, when Minority Leader Mat Erpelding, D-Boise, made a motion to move HB 563, the “Plan First Idaho” bill, to the top of the House’s 3rd Reading Calendar for debate. The bill, which would seek a federal waiver to provide family planning services – but not abortion – to low-income Idaho women who make too much to qualify for Medicaid, cleared the House Health & Welfare Committee weeks ago, but has been stalled on the House calendar ever since; you can read my full story here at Erpelding’s motion failed on a 14-55 vote; all 11 House Democrats, plus three Republicans, Reps. Giddings, McDonald and Perry, voted in favor of it.

Some of the lengthy debate on the motion echoed yesterday’s dramatic debate on pulling the governor’s Idaho Health Care Plan bill back to committee, rather than debating it in the full House and voting it up or down this year.

“This bill was put on hold in hopes that a previous piece of legislation would have made it,” Erpelding told the House. “This bill deserves a vote. … This is about women in the gap, and it is important.”

Rep. Ilana Rubel, D-Boise, said, “I serve on the committee where this bill was heard. There was extremely compelling testimony – I think this bill is important. I think we have ducked too many issues.”

House Health and Welfare Chairman Fred Wood, R-Burley, who voted for the bill in committee, opposed the motion. “The problem here is there are some real issues with this bill,” he said. “In a couple of senses it doesn’t go far enough, in a couple of other senses there need to be more restrictions on it, because some people aren’t going to vote for it” without changes. “I voted for this bill coming out of committee because this concept is an excellent concept and this concept in my opinion needs to go forward.” But he said he believes it needs amendments before it can pass.

Rep. Karey Hanks, R-St. Anthony, said, “I just believe as a Republican that we need to be working on less governance instead of more.”

Rep. Sally Toone, D-Gooding, said, “It is our job in this body, when we get something from a committee that has vetted a bill, it is our job to debate it. Right, wrong, win, lose, that’s what we’ve been tasked with doing. And our committees which see, I think we’re close to 700 bills this session along the way, that we vet them in committees, again the public hears them, we hear from constituents, we have emails galore. When they come out of committee, it then becomes this body’s job to debate them one last time, so all of us, representing all the citizens of Idaho have the ability to debate a bill. So I would encourage us to do that job, and it’s here, let’s have the debate.”

House Speaker Scott Bedke noted that the previous decisions to delay the bill and leave it hanging on the calendar all occurred by unanimous consent.

Erpelding said, “We should hear this bill because it would make a difference. It would be a conversation to have in the large body that we haven’t had.” He said he strongly objects to arguments that lawmakers are taking the “long view” on health care and that it’s a marathon. “Having been a marathon runner, six years is an awfully long marathon,” he said. “Having been someone who has climbed mountains and spent 50 days on mountains, six years is an awfully long expedition. It is time to take up health care in Idaho. And if we can’t do it today, then I would hope we would actually have the tenacity to actually do it next year.”

This bill would have sought a federal waiver to set up a five-year demonstration project providing family planning services and supplies to Idaho women ages 19-44 with family incomes at or below 133% of the federal poverty level who aren’t eligible for Medicare, Medicaid, or health insurance that covers family planning services. Medicaid currently provides only short-term coverage for birth for those women. The bill was projected to save Idaho tens of millions of dollars by preventing unintended pregnancies.

After the vote, the House recessed until 2 p.m.

Betsy Z. Russell
Betsy Z. Russell joined The Spokesman-Review in 1991. She currently is a reporter in the Boise Bureau covering Idaho state government and politics, and other news from Idaho's state capital.

Follow Betsy online: