Arrow-right Camera

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Tuesday, January 28, 2020  Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Rain 38° Rain

Spin Control

Sunday Spin: Counting coup in losing fight over budget

OLYMPIA – Amendments line the bar in front of the Deputy Clerk Nona Snell, Chief Clerk Bernard Dean and other members of the House administration before debate begins on the 2017-19 operating budget. (Jim Camden / The Spokesman-Review)
OLYMPIA – Amendments line the bar in front of the Deputy Clerk Nona Snell, Chief Clerk Bernard Dean and other members of the House administration before debate begins on the 2017-19 operating budget. (Jim Camden / The Spokesman-Review)

It’s a rare budget debate that passes without a lawmaker reminding colleagues a budget “is a statement of values” – or something close.

If values can be measured by making them valuable in dollars and cents, that’s demonstrably true. But what budget debates become, frequently, are political opportunities for counting coup.

For those unfamiliar with the term, it stems from the Plains Indian tradition of going up to your enemy and touching him with your coup stick. One did not kill or even injure the enemy to count coup. It was enough to come as close as possible to show your bravery, tap with the stick and get away. Your deed could be celebrated around the fires for years to come.

There seemed to be a significant amount of coup counting last week as House Democrats brought their 2017-19 operating budget up for debate. It is a principle of Legislating 101 that no majority party brings up a budget unless it has the votes to pass it, so the scheduling meant it was going to pass, however horrible the Republicans might be convinced it was.

As is typical for the party in the minority, that didn’t keep Republicans from filing a slew of amendments, which is another principle of Legislating 101. When combined with a slightly smaller boatload of changes various Democrats wanted, the lineup of amendments spanned almost the width of the House rostrum as though a Las Vegas dealer had spread them like a giant deck of cards.

House Speaker Pro Tem Tina Orwall might’ve been guilty of the biggest understatement of the week as she formally called the legislation to the floor with the bill number and the standard explanation “…there are amendments.” There were, in fact, 63, requiring debate to be spread over two days.

Some were relatively minor adjustments in spending, like $2 million a year to help county fairs. While that’s a nice chunk of change to most readers, in a $44.9 billion budget, $4 million isn’t even a rounding error. Yet lawmakers seemed to spend an inordinate amount of time praising the values of county fairs. During debate we learned many of them have happy memories of county fairs, that Rep. Mary Dye, R-Pomeroy, has been in charge poultry and rabbit competition at her county fair and Rep. Liz Pike, R-Camas, swore that the best milk shakes in the world are served at the Clark County Dairy Women’s Booth at that fair.

Some Democrats also had fond fair memories, but not enough to cough up $4 mill. Notice to any Democrat running in a rural district next year: Thy name shall be fair killer.

Most of the coup counting was over taxes. Rep. Matt Manweller, R-Ellensburg, asked the House to add a “Truth in Budgeting” section that would require the House to produce a budget solely based on existing revenue projections as well as one based on taxes that are proposed but not yet approved. The governor is required to do that, he said, and the House should, too.

“To quote Jerry Maguire, ‘Show me the money,’” Manweller said.

House Appropriations Chairman Timm Ormsby, D-Spokane, said Democrats will show Republicans the money starting Monday morning when they begin hearings on the tax package. But even though the governor produces such a budget, called Book 1, it is generally ignored, he noted

“Nobody’s talked about the governor’s Book 1 budget because it sucks,” Ormsby opined, drawing chuckles from lawmakers of both parties, but no disagreement.

There were efforts to halt any attempt at a capital gains tax or a graduated real estate excise tax, and to use the Rainy Day fund to keep schools open if the state Supreme Court were to decide the Legislature failed to meet its deadline to improve education. All failed.

Among the most inventive was an amendment by Rep. Vincent Buys, R-Lynden, seeking to ding Seattle (by which he meant liberal Democrats) with the failure of a major waste water treatment facility that has dumped sewage into the Puget Sound. Last year the House approved a budget amendment that forbade travel by state employees to Victoria, British Columbia, until that city stopped dumping sewage in the sound, he said. State employees should be similarly barred from travel to Seattle until the West Point treatment center is properly operating, he said.

“All we’re asking for is a little consistency,” said Buys.

This prompted some of his colleagues to wax eloquent about abuses by “jackbooted” inspectors from the Department of Ecology, who allegedly have kept country kids from raising sheep for the fair. Republicans just couldn’t seem to let go of fair stories.

Eventually, Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon, D-Burien, felt forced to remind Republicans: “In contrast to Victoria, B.C., Seattle is a part of Washington state. Sometimes I think that escapes us here.”

Buys amendment also failed, but when House Republicans next gather he may get a notch for his coup stick.



Jim Camden
Jim Camden joined The Spokesman-Review in 1981. He is currently the political reporter and state government reporter in the newspaper's Olympia bureau office.

Follow Jim online: