Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Take The Chance To Savor The Greatness That Is Tiger

John Steadman Baltimore Sun

Drift back through antiquity, to centuries obliterated by the sand traps of time, to when lonesome shepherds were using their crosiers in a Scottish rite of self-amusement. What they were inadvertently inventing was to be later formalized as golf but, out of frustration, also referred to by other names not fit for use in refined company.

In the primitive past, the shepherds were knocking stones about the meadows and bringing creation to this most damnable vixen of all games that drops the strongest and sternest of warriors to their knees, pleading for mercy.

Golf, one of mankind’s remaining unsolved puzzles, now brings an astounding prodigy to the spotlight of center stage. He dropped the name Eldrick, given to him as an infant, and is now more appropriately known as Tiger Woods.

This is no unseen tiger lurking in the woods at the Masters tournament who is preparing to pounce on unsuspecting adventurers bent on seeking the same prize. He has already earned the attention and respect from the other challengers in the hunt.

When he wins, it’s never going to be an upset because his reservoir of ability knows no limits. He’s a threat anytime he puts a tee in the ground. Woods is still at a formative age, 21, a time when most other young men have no idea in what direction they are heading.

Is it heresy to say, without reservation, that he threatens the regal position of such elite predecessors as the sacrosanct troika of Robert Tyre Jones Jr., otherwise known as Bobby; Arnold Palmer, and Jack Nicklaus, not to mention such other legends as Walter Hagen, Ben Hogan, Byron Nelson, Gene Sarazen and Sam Snead?

This is just the beginning of the Tiger Woods Era. If you can connect to what he has already achieved, then it is easily discernible that he be perceived, even at this rookie stage, as potentially the finest golfer the world has known. It’s easy to get carried away in measuring what he can do, even though he hasn’t yet actually achieved the records of others he is compared with on a purely factual basis.

Having such an endowment of talent, in the performing arts and sports, brings with it an unwelcome scrutiny that isn’t always quite fair. Woods hasn’t won any of the major classics of his sport, but already some self-anointed critics, mere jackals in the jungle, are trying to bring him down.

He was, in truth, caught off stride using bad language and engaging in a flurry of telling dirty jokes by a national magazine writer. It was an embarrassment to himself, to his parents, the way he was raised and also to the grand citadel of learning known as Stanford University, where he was studying economics so he’d be better equipped to handle the money his golf swing promised to bring him.

But, without a doubt, there is a double-standard rearing its ugly head and snarling around this phenomenal talent and anticipated icon-to-be. Woods deserves to be judged by the same code of conduct granted other men and women. If you’ve ever spent time with Snead, on or off the golf course, there were similar moments of blue stories spicing the conversation.

To offer other pertinent examples, Hogan and Hagan drank more than even their close friends and bartenders ever knew. But they, like Snead, were golfers, not Trappist monks devoted to lives of religious meditation and self-sacrifice. Yet a young practitioner of the sport, Woods, is being singled out for a special kind of specific evaluation.

Why should he be held up to certain prescribed lines of evaluation? Hasn’t he already served as a credit to golf by the way he plays and the manner in which he carries himself?

To use a modern refrain, cut him some slack.

Carrying it to a ridiculous level of so-called impropriety, there was an actual cause celebre resulting from his picture appearing on the cover of an earlier U.S. Golf Association Journal that showed him thrusting his fist in the air after winning a championship. Letters came to the publication from subscribers saying he deserved to be censured.

But, come on. How many times have Palmer, Nicklaus and all the rest of the touring pros made similar gestures to express jubilation when a vital shot has dropped into the cup?

“Society has changed,” said Woods. “It used to be that people were more respectful of each other’s privacy and private lives. Now they want to know the dirt.” Obviously, he knows whereof he speaks.

He hasn’t reached the summit, but he is headed there and already the cynics are trying to pull him down. Woods is not perfect, as those of us who applaud him for his ability and demeanor would like him to be.

This is not a robot or a machine but a human being, with the same frailties the rest of us have, who must resist the temptations his new celebrity lifestyle constantly puts in front of him.

To get to where he is, Woods has won four tournaments since turning pro last September, and finished in the top five in nine of 17 events. Before any of that, he took three straight U.S. Junior Amateur titles and the same number of U.S. Amateur championships.

But with all his fame and riches, meaning a total of $60 million for endorsing goods, there is a thread of resentment, fed by envy, that he is too good to be true.

Let Tiger Woods continue to hear more of the applause that cascades across our land of opportunity, where ability should be the only scorecard to assessing the performance of man or woman.