Calling for a “cooling-off period” in the wake of the investigation of Speaker Newt Gingrich, House leaders imposed a two-month moratorium Wednesday on the filing of ethics complaints and promised a thorough review of the process for handling future cases.
House Majority Leader Dick Armey, R-Texas, announced formation of a bipartisan task force to review the way the House polices itself and to recommend changes. In the meantime, he said, the House Ethics Committee will not receive, initiate or review any ethics complaints between now and April 11.
“After the past few tumultuous months, I think we must have a brief cooling-off period where members can sit back and examine where the ethics process works, where it doesn’t and how it might be improved,” Armey said.
The moratorium is the latest in a series of moves around Capitol Hill intended to pull the plug on the high-voltage partisanship which has suffused Congress since Republicans took control in 1995.
On Tuesday, Clinton and congressional leaders agreed to a list of five issues of common concern on which they hope to push for early action. Early next month, Republican and Democratic members of the House are planning a weekend retreat in Hershey, Pa., to help lawmakers get beyond partisan divisions and to restore “civility” to their dealings with one another.
One effect of the moratorium will be to postpone a committee decision on how to handle charges against Gingrich that still were unresolved at the end of the last Congress.
The case brought before the House in January centered on allegations that the Georgia Republican improperly had used tax-exempt funds for political purposes and had misled the committee in the course of its investigation. However, the panel also received separate complaints alleging that Gingrich had received improper gifts and contributions from GOPAC, a political action committee he once headed.
In late September, the committee said it would pursue the allegations, including the charge that Gingrich had accepted $250,000 from GOPAC for personal use, but the panel did not act on the matter by the end of the last Congress. Technically, the complaint lapsed with the new Congress and will have to be refiled or reinitiated by the committee. Now, that cannot happen until after April 11.
Even House Minority Whip David E. Bonior, D-Mich., who has instigated many of the complaints filed against Gingrich, says a cooling-off period is a good idea. “It will help set a tone in Congress that will move us past that bitter debate,” he said.
The move to reappraise the ethics process comes in the wake of the House’s vote last month to reprimand Gingrich and make him pay $300,000 because of his ethical lapses.
The two-year House Ethics Committee investigation was a wrenching process that strained relations between the parties and, some said, left the ethics process in a shambles.
Armey and Democratic Minority Leader Richard A. Gephardt, D-Mo., each named six members to serve on the ethics task force on Wednesday.
Among the questions they will consider, Armey said, are who can file a complaint, when investigations should be initiated and how long they should last.
Local journalism is essential.
Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.
Subscribe to the Coronavirus newsletter
Get the day’s latest Coronavirus news delivered to your inbox by subscribing to our newsletter.