Hearing Canceled In Animal-Cruelty Case
Attorneys agreed to cancel a hearing today on a prosecution request to force a Newport-area couple to begin serving their sentences for animal-cruelty convictions in connection with a “puppy mill” that drew national attention.
Jeannette and Swen Bergman were convicted in June 1997, but still haven’t started their sentences because of confusion and delays in their appeal. Among other problems, former District Court Judge Chuck Baechler failed to file documents promptly.
No written order was ever filed to allow the Bergmans to remain free while appealing their convictions. Without such a clock-stopping “stay,” Deputy Prosecutor Tony Koures feared that failure might mean Jeanette Bergman wouldn’t have to serve more than five months of her nine-month sentence because the court’s two-year jurisdiction over her would expire.
Koures asked the court to send Jeanette Bergman to jail immediately to preserve as much as possible of her sentence. Now, though, he and defense attorney Charles Dorn will ask District Court Judge Lynda Eaton to issue an after-the-fact order that a “stay” has been in place all along. If approved, the order would preserve the Bergmans’ right to appeal as well as the possibility they would have to serve their full sentences.
All the parties thought a stay had been filed, as orally agreed when the sentences were imposed. Attorneys couldn’t check for a written order until a week ago, when Baechler returned the file to the court office. Baechler, who resigned under pressure Nov. 1, had kept the file at his home since the trial.