Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Partly Cloudy Day 38° Partly Cloudy
News >  Pacific NW

Grizzly protection is weak in Idaho forests, groups say

A grizzly sow and her cubs wrestle in the snow in this 2002 photo taken in Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming.
 (File/Associated PressFile/Associated Press / The Spokesman-Review)
A grizzly sow and her cubs wrestle in the snow in this 2002 photo taken in Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming. (File/Associated PressFile/Associated Press / The Spokesman-Review)
Associated Press

MISSOULA, Mont. — Seven environmental groups filed an administrative appeal Monday, saying a Forest Service plan doesn’t close enough roads to help protect grizzly bears in the Lolo, Kootenai and Idaho Panhandle national forests.

Grizzly bear populations in the Cabinet-Yaak and Selkirk ecosystems number only about 30 or 40 animals, so few that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 1999 said they warranted listing as an endangered species.

But other species were a higher priority, so the bears remained listed as “threatened,” as are all grizzly bears in the lower 48 states.

“The problem here is that these populations are endangered,” said Mike Bader, a consultant with the Alliance for the Wild Rockies. “But the Forest Service is talking about closing just 70 miles of roads over nine years. That’s just not addressing the problem.”

In the appeal filed with Regional Forester Gail Kimbell, the environmental groups said the agency failed to take appropriate action to reduce the network of more than 20,000 miles of backcountry roads on the three forests.

Biologists have found that more than 77 percent of human-caused bear deaths in the area occurred within one-third mile of a road, Bader said.

Forest Service officials could not be reached to comment on the appeal late Monday.

Earlier this year, the three western Montana forests amended their management plans to better address the issue of road densities in grizzly bear habitat.

At the time, Kootenai Forest Supervisor Bob Castaneda said the amendments were “the closest to a win-win situation for the bear population, public access and resource management and protection.”

The amendments would reduce the mileage of open roads on the three forests from 3,082 to 3,010. Another 353-498 miles of “not drivable” roads would be reclaimed.

The remaining forest roads would stay open, and any further closures would be determined on a case-by-case basis.

If the Forest Service does not respond to the appeal with tougher, pro-bear plans, the environmentalists will take their complaint to court, said attorney Marc Fink with the Western Environmental Law Center.

Joining the Alliance in the appeal were several environmental groups.

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe to the Coronavirus newsletter

Get the day’s latest Coronavirus news delivered to your inbox by subscribing to our newsletter.