Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Signage committee stacked, agenda-filled

Add Spokesman-Review on Google
The Spokesman-Review

The Spokane Valley City Council chose five persons with special interests – a stacked committee with an agenda – to head a committee on signage reform.

They used the same old tired arguments: First Amendment rights, not legislating aesthetics and not being able to locate businesses because of a lack of signs. Their recommendations are for more, larger, higher and brighter signs – and they want to abolish some of the aesthetic corridors from the list.

When the city of Spokane Valley was formed, Duane Halliday of Lamar Outdoor Advertising (billboards) said “I only want to keep the number of billboards we currently have.” Interesting how that translates to opening up aesthetic corridors to more billboards.

And can John Johnson, owner of Sign Corp., be the same person who sat on the committee with me and helped prepare the sign code adopted by Spokane County in 2001? Is this the same John Johnson who balked at the idea of a review committee? The same John Johnson who dislikes looking at model cities with responsible sign codes as a guide to good signage?

Where were the recommendations for sign enforcement? Is there no end to what this committee will do to further trash the community? We are urged to step up and get involved. A stacked committee chosen by the council prohibits involvement.

Incidentally, who can remember when we had a 7-foot snowfall that would limit the use of monument signs?

Jan Hannick

Spokane Valley