Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Clear Night 56° Clear
News >  Nation/World

Hilltop cross in La Jolla must go, council decides

Kimberly Edds Special to The Washington Post

Sixteen years of legal wrangling over whether a 43-foot cross at the top of Mount Soledad in La Jolla, Calif., violates the separation of church and state came to a halt Tuesday when the San Diego City Council voted 5 to 3 to reject a plan to keep the cross where it is.

After more than 50 years overlooking the city of San Diego, the cross, erected as part of a veterans war memorial, will be moved. The vote, after an emotional six-hour public hearing that drew hundreds of residents, slams the door on recent attempts to retain the cross as part of a national monument, including an effort by two Republican members of Congress.

Built on land owned by the city, the cross has been repeatedly ordered by a federal judge to be removed from its current location – the centerpiece of several circles of granite honoring service members.

After several unsuccessful attempts by the city to sell the property to retain the cross, Reps. Randy “Duke” Cunningham, R-Calif., and Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., inserted a provision in a spending bill last year designating it a national veterans memorial. President Bush signed the bill in December. Under the legislation, however, the city had to agree to give the land to the National Park Service.

But even if the land deal had gone through, it still wasn’t certain the cross could stay.

Last week, City Attorney Michael Aguirre issued a legal opinion that said donating the land to the federal government for a religious purpose would be a violation of the state constitution.

“Further,” he wrote, “based on current case law, such a transaction would also violate the federal Constitution and, in all likelihood, provide fodder for additional legal proceedings against the city.”

Attorney James McElroy, who sued the city on behalf of atheist Philip Paulson to have the cross removed, said the city had no choice but to refuse to donate the land or return to court – again.

“It’s a preeminent Christian symbol on public land. It’s a pretty simple call,” McElroy said. “But these people are under tremendous political pressure to save that cross. Not a single one of them wanted to vote the way they did.”

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe now to get breaking news alerts in your email inbox

Get breaking news delivered to your inbox as it happens.