House gives gun industry legal shield
WASHINGTON – The House Thursday voted to shield companies that make and sell firearms from lawsuits by the victims of shootings, sending the legislation to the White House and handing the nation’s gun lobby a paramount victory it has sought for years.
The House’s 283 to 144 vote, less than three months after the Senate approved identical legislation, delighted President Bush, who portrayed it as part of the administration’s drive to “stem frivolous lawsuits” and said he will sign it into law. Leading proponents of gun control immediately vowed to challenge the law’s constitutionality.
The legislation is intended to cut off an avenue that gun-control advocates have used in recent years to exert leverage on the firearms industry, trying to curb the sale of weapons to criminals by holding it financially responsible for crimes. The National Rifle Association and other gun enthusiasts have complained that the expense of fighting lawsuits put manufacturers and gun stores on shaky financial ground, regardless of who wins the cases.
Shortly before Thursday’s vote, House Judiciary Committee Chairman F. James Sensenbrenner Jr., R-Wis., said, “Congress must fulfill its constitutional duty and exercise its authority … to deny a few state courts the power to bankrupt the national firearms industry and deny all Americans their fundamental right to bear arms.”
Wayne LaPierre, the NRA’s executive vice president, called the vote “a historic day for the NRA and also for the Second Amendment.” Saying that Congress “saved the firearms industry today,” LaPierre asserted that “the people that want to ban guns in this country have not been able to win in the political arena” and thus have resorted to “a blizzard of litigation to bankrupt the industry with legal fees.” He estimated that the law would cut off 15 current lawsuits around the country.
But Dennis Henigan, director of the legal action project at the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, called the legislation “such an egregious piece of special-interest legislation, it is almost shameless.” He said the law would violate a basic premise of tort law because it “retroactively bars lawsuits against a particular industry, even if the members of that industry behave negligently.”
“We are going to vigorously attack the law in courts,” Henigan said, remarking that “Congress has no power to retroactively deprive people of their rights.”
The legislation would allow lawsuits under limited circumstances but, in general, provides a broader shield against litigation than most of nearly three dozen laws that states have adopted to limit gun liability.