Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Clear Night 59° Clear
News >  Features

Film betrays times it tries to portray

Judith Martin United Feature Syndicate

Historical dramas hold little suspense for Miss Manners. She always knows what the first conversation between important characters will contain.

A young patriot approaches a jolly bespectacled man with scraggly hair. “I never thought I would meet the great Dr. Franklin,” he says.

“Oh, please,” is the modest reply. “It’s Ben.”

No matter what the period and no matter what the age, rank or nature of the personage portrayed, one of the first items of exposition will establish that the characters will call one another by their first names.

It is an etiquette issue handled by people who are ignorant of the history and practice of etiquette.

Miss Manners means no indictment of the entertainment industry. The ubiquity of this mistake has more to do with age and the pseudo-camaraderie now practiced in the workplace.

Far from meaning to portray their characters as rude, they mistakenly believe that they are illuminating such character traits as modesty, kindness and a democratic spirit. But prior to the mid-20th century, even the most modest, kind and democratic of people would have considered the use of first names by nonintimates to be condescending and insulting.

There was plenty of that rudeness going around. Women, African-Americans, servants and low-ranking employees were routinely addressed by their first names by people who expected the respect of titles and surnames in return. But no one would volunteer to be treated that way.

Nowadays, people have a hard time believing that formality is not rude under any circumstances. If they are involved in making historical dramas, they have at least discovered that it was once common for people to address one another formally. So they figure that nice people would have protested.

On the contrary. Nice people would have been particularly careful to maintain such formalities because they symbolized respect. Attempting to rush others into an unwarranted display of intimacy would have been considered presumptuous and vulgar.

Such concepts as instant intimacy, deference to age as a slur and the ersatz friendship in professional situations had not yet come along. Granting the use of one’s first name was an important, sometimes thrilling, sign of affection. But if the unauthorized dare to assume this privilege without permission, people took it as being as much of a slight as – well, as people do now when telemarketers and doctors address them by their first names.

In any case, those scenes that purport to be historic betray the spirit of the times they purport to represent. Miss Manners has often had cause to lament that historic dramas that may have been stunningly researched in terms of costume and setting betray total innocence of the etiquette practiced at the time.

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe to the Coronavirus newsletter

Get the day’s latest Coronavirus news delivered to your inbox by subscribing to our newsletter.