Arrow-right Camera
Subscribe now

More than taxes at stake

The Spokesman-Review

Tea party critics have attempted to marginalize the April 15 participants as selfish, unpatriotic whiners who don’t want to pay taxes. The tea party I attended wasn’t simply about taxes. The attendees were astute about the Constitution and the intentions of the Founding Fathers. People are livid because adherence to the Constitution has been neglected and reverence for it has been eroded. This erosion has resulted in an out-of-control, power-hungry and corrupt government.

Opponents are fearful about (and therefore belittle) the tea parties because they know that a groundswell of respect for and adherence to the Constitution undermines their socialist agenda, as well as their ability to maintain their control and power. Thomas Jefferson correctly noted that the mischief which arises by man’s lust for power can best be counteracted by “the chains of the Constitution.”

We patriots must continue our defense of the Constitution. The United States Constitution is the best bastion against socialism and tyranny. District by district, we must continue to apply the heat.

Debra Zingg

Mica



Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-3815

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy