Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Partly Cloudy Day 32° Partly Cloudy

Endorsements and editorials are made solely by the ownership of this newspaper. As is the case at most newspapers across the nation, The Spokesman-Review newsroom and its editors are not a part of this endorsement process. Click here to learn more.

Opinion >  Editorial

Editorial: Ombudsman ordinance should only get stronger

The Spokesman-Review

Though we must wait another week, the Spokane City Council looks to be on the verge of adopting a stronger police ombudsman ordinance. This is good news, because the community had grown skeptical of the current version, which doesn’t allow the ombudsman, Tim Burns, to conduct independent investigations.

Because the original ordinance was watered down due to worries over a police union challenge, the audience that attended Monday night’s council meeting grew wary when they heard that a new draft had been produced earlier that day. As the meeting stretched into Tuesday morning, the council voted to postpone a decision.

As it turns out, the new version still allows the ombudsman to conduct independent inquiries, rather than merely shadowing the probes of the Police Department. The late changes seemed designed to make sure that the ordinance can withstand a likely legal challenge from the Spokane Police Guild on whether the ombudsman will be involved with punishment decisions.

Both the original and new drafts state: “The OPO (ombudsman) shall not have a role in any disciplinary matter. All disciplinary decisions will be made by the chief (or designee).”

However, some council members were worried that a provision that would have opened up Internal Affairs investigations could be interpreted by the courts or the Public Employment Relations Commission as veering into disciplinary waters since Internal Affairs probes can lead to punishment. The new draft strikes that section, but it still gives Burns expanded powers to interview complainants and witnesses for his reports even if Internal Affairs has declined to investigate.

Currently, Burns can only review police investigations and determine whether they were “timely, thorough and objective.” Eighteen of the 19 cases he reviewed in his first year received that blessing, but the general public hasn’t been convinced that he has enough independence for those ratings to be meaningful. Burns reversed himself recently, saying that to be credible his office does need more power. In addition, the city has just established a website for the ombudsman to make it easier for citizens to file complaints or praise. We hope that one day it will also contain detailed reports of each investigation.

Burns’ request for more independence could be the tipping point for council members and the mayor. It should be, because he is right. He won’t be taken seriously until he is independent.

To respond online, click on Opinion under the Topics menu at www.spokesman.com.
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe to the Coronavirus newsletter

Get the day’s latest Coronavirus news delivered to your inbox by subscribing to our newsletter.