Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Miss Manners: Wife left off invitation for gala

Judith Martin Universal Uclick

DEAR MISS MANNERS: I received an invitation to a “black tie gala event” to be held by a federal government agency.

I had previously received a “save the date” notice, which I shared with my wife. We both thought she would be invited, but unfortunately, I just found out from the event coordinator that she is not invited because of “limited seating” and the apparent need to invite interested members of Congress.

Indeed, the invitation simply says “you.” I know that proper etiquette would be to include the spouse in a wedding invitation. Does that also apply to a “black tie gala event”? Or is our hurt at this perceived slight unjustified?

GENTLE READER: It is a shock to Miss Manners’ patriotic heart to hear that the federal government is categorizing people as first- and second-class citizens. You may well believe that members of Congress were not asked to attend a “gala” without spouses, partners or acquaintances.

But perhaps this was a lesser transgression. You neglected to tell Miss Manners whether you work for that agency.

In that case, you should not have been sent an invitation, as if you were to be there as a guest. Rather, you should have been asked if you were willing to work that evening, answering questions, touting the agency’s mission, explaining where the bathrooms were. You would be dressed as a guest, but under no illusion that you were being offered hospitality, and your wife would not be included unless she, too, worked for the agency.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: How long should one wait in anticipation of a wedding and/or baby shower gift? Should you mention in passing that you have not received one yet?

GENTLE READER: Before you put a collection agency to work on them?

It does not seem to have occurred to you that giving presents is a voluntary act. Miss Manners recommends concentrating your attention on enjoying your marriage or baby, rather than on using them for material advantage.