Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Clear Night 73° Clear
News >  Features

FDA to clarify labels for drugs’ safety during pregnancy

Lauran Neergaard Associated Press

WASHINGTON – Pregnant and worried about your medication? The Food and Drug Administration is revamping confusing labels on prescription drugs to make it easier to understand which are safe to use.

Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding often agonize over whether a drug needed for their own health might hurt their baby, or even if the woman’s changing body requires a higher or lower dose.

There are more than 6 million pregnancies in the U.S. every year, and FDA says women take an average of three to five prescription drugs during pregnancy. They may have a pregnancy-related infection or morning sickness. Or they may have an ongoing condition – asthma, diabetes, epilepsy or depression – that could dangerously worsen if they avoided treatment because of drug concerns.

Few medications have been fully studied to answer those questions, and what information is available is hard to tease out of the fine print on drug labels. The letters A, B, C, D and X are used to convey risk, but FDA admits that’s hugely misleading. A “B” drug might not really be safer than a “C” drug that just hasn’t been properly studied in people to tell.

Wednesday, FDA announced it’s scrapping those old labels. Starting next summer, labels on new prescription drugs must spell out, in a clearly designated section, what’s known about safe use during pregnancy or breastfeeding. Older drugs will phase in the new labels over the next three to five years.

“More information about drugs will be provided than ever before,” said Dr. Sandra Kweder of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation.

The information won’t be on small pill bottles. It’s required to be on the official drug labeling that doctors are supposed to read when deciding to prescribe, information that often is passed to consumers as package inserts at the pharmacy.

Nor does the new rule apply to over-the-counter medications.

Still, “this is a huge step forward,” said Dr. Christina Chambers of the University of California, San Diego, who works with the MotherToBaby hotline that counsels worried callers about medications during pregnancy.

Under the new rules, a drug’s label “encompasses the larger picture of the safety data in the context of treatment, or lack of treatment,” she said.

Some medications do come with a lot of pregnancy information. Diclegis, for example, is the only drug to win FDA approval specifically to treat morning sickness. Doctors’ groups and the government recommend a flu shot for pregnant women, to protect themselves and because the baby is born with some of mom’s protection.

Other drugs are known to pose particular birth-defect risks. For example, the FDA requires versions of the acne drug isotretinoin, first marketed as Accutane, to be sold under special tight controls.

But many fall somewhere in the middle. Maybe they have risks only in the first trimester, when organs are forming. Or there simply may not be enough research to know.

Consider urinary tract infections, common during pregnancy. Some antibiotics are safe throughout pregnancy but require a dose change; others are supposed to be avoided in certain trimesters, noted Dr. Siobhan Dolan, an adviser to the March of Dimes, which for years has urged the FDA’s label move.

Another example: Pregnant women often are given old blood pressure medications even though new ones may work better, because the pregnancy impact of the newer brands hasn’t yet been studied, Dolan added.

The new labels are supposed to offer details that Dolan said could help doctors and women weigh the known pros and cons with the unanswered questions. The labels will say if safety information comes from scientific studies of people, or only is predicted based on animal research. They must list registries that are collecting information on how pregnant women fare.

They must provide information about how much of the drug collects in breast milk, and any effects on the baby.

A final subsection will say if the drug may impact future fertility when used by women or men of reproductive age.

If the drug hasn’t been studied for reproductive safety, the label must say so. While the FDA isn’t forcing companies to do new pregnancy studies, Kweder said the changes will pressure them to add the most up-to-date information that’s available.

Easier-to-read labels are only a first step, cautioned Cynthia Pellegrini of the March of Dimes – because many drugs won’t have much pregnancy information to list.

“This format will make even more clear how critical the need is for more human pregnancy data for all medications likely to be used by women of reproductive age,” agreed UCSD’s Chambers.

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe to the Coronavirus newsletter

Get the day’s latest Coronavirus news delivered to your inbox by subscribing to our newsletter.