Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Low oil prices chill towns’ boom

In this Oct. 30 photo, Joe Warner fills up his tank at a gas station in Atlanta. Lower oil prices, while good for the broader U.S. economy, are a threat to what has been a surprising and dramatic surge in oil production in the U.S., and to drilling communities that have come to depend on oil money. (Associated Press)
Josh Wood And Jonathan Fahey Associated Press

WILLISTON, N.D. – Marcus Jundt moved to Williston from Minnesota almost four years ago and has opened four restaurants there since. Food isn’t propelling his business, though. It’s oil.

“Everything I’ve done in Williston is a derivative of oil,” he says.

That oil has averaged $96 a barrel over the past four years, fueling more drilling, more hiring and bigger appetites in North Dakota, Texas, Oklahoma and elsewhere. Now oil has hit a rough patch, plunging to $79 from $107 in June on fears of a global glut. Many expect these lower prices will stick around for a while.

Lower oil prices, while good for the broader U.S. economy, are a threat to what has been a surprising and dramatic surge in oil production in the U.S., and to drilling communities that have come to depend on oil money.

“If the price gets low enough and stays there long enough, I’m sure it will affect the number of people and the amount of money that will be spent in the greater community – and I have exposure to that,” Jundt says.

U.S. oil production has gone up by 3.5 million barrels per day, or 70 percent, since 2008. High prices fueled the boom, providing oil companies the profits and investor cash to buy up land, pay for drilling rigs and develop new technology. Places like Williston, a once-sleepy farming town, thrived with increased economic activity, well-paying jobs and rising tax revenue.

Prices would have to fall lower, and stay low for a while, to turn the U.S. oil boom into a bust. Wells that are already producing won’t be shut off and enormous projects with long-time horizons will still be built. Many drillers have funded next year’s drilling plans by selling oil in the futures market.

Still, a $20 drop in the price of oil means $170 million less in revenue every day for the U.S. oil industry.

Investors are less willing to take on the risk of funding new expansion without hopes for a big reward, and oil companies big and small are left with less money to go and drill the next well.

BP, Chevron and Shell told investors last week they would reduce spending on new development because of lower prices.

Mike McDonald, co-owner of Triad Energy, which usually operates one or two rigs in Oklahoma, says that low prices have stung, and now he’s not planning to get another rig going after current projects are complete.

Drilling in fields that aren’t very prolific will stop because it won’t be profitable. For example, drillers in North Dakota’s Burke County need $81 a barrel on average to break even, according to the Department of Mineral Resources, while the price is just $28 in McKenzie County, the state’s top oil-producing county.

North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources director Lynn Helms says companies are looking to cut costs on such things as electricity generation and water disposal. He says the average operating cost of a well has risen 36 percent in the past year to $15,000 a month, mirroring an industrywide struggle with higher costs.

The analysis firm IHS calculates in a report released Monday that the income oil and gas companies made on the capital they spent has fallen by half since 2000, even as oil prices increased. “The recent price drop in global crude prices will only add to these financial challenges,” says IHS’s Daniel Pratt.

For now, boomtowns like Williston are still going strong. Hotels are full, restaurants like Jundt’s are packed with tired roughnecks and roads are choked with hulking oil field trucks.

But when drillers cut costs, communities will eventually feel it. “I haven’t noticed anything yet,” says Bert Anderson, mayor of Crosby, a small town just south of the Canadian border where oil is particularly expensive to produce. But if oil stays at current prices, “eventually it will have an impact,” he says.

Helms says that the state’s next two-year budget may have to be revised because the preliminary budget forecast was based on $90 a barrel.

On Wall Street, there is considerable disagreement about the duration of lower prices and the potential industry impact. But there’s broad agreement that at least the rate of growth in the U.S. will slow.

Goldman Sachs analysts wrote last week that OPEC countries are unlikely to curtail production to nudge prices higher – which means U.S. drillers will have to do so instead.

Bernstein Research’s Bob Brackett estimates one-third of U.S. shale oil production is “uneconomic” at $80 per barrel. As a result, he says, producers in the U.S. and elsewhere will cut back and the price will quickly recover.

Thomas Driscoll of Barclays believes economics are “robust” in most of the U.S. shale regions at prices between $75 and $80 a barrel. While he expects the rate of U.S. production growth to slow, he doesn’t think production would stop increasing unless long-term oil prices fall to a range of $65 to $75 per barrel.

That’s certainly where it would hurt for Nelson Wood. His family’s ties to oil stretch back to 1938, when his mother started in the business after an oil discovery kicked off a boom in Illinois.

Since 2001, Wood has grown his company from five to 30 employees, and now has 200 small wells in Illinois. These wells, known as “stripper wells,” produce just a few barrels of oil per day. By comparison, a new well in North Dakota might produce 500 barrels per day and a big offshore oil platform might produce 200,000 barrels per day.

For now, Wood has suspended hiring and reduced plans for new wells next year to four from 10. He says his company, Wood Energy of Mt. Vernon, Illinois, is still profitable overall at $80 a barrel.

But things are starting to get tight: “$70 starts to get in a place that we don’t want to be,” he says.

Some say a small slowdown could have some upside. Local governments in drilling regions are straining to keep up with demand for new services and infrastructure to deal with population increases and the new economic activity. It might even help drillers who have had trouble finding enough workers and equipment.

“A little bit of a slowdown to give everyone a chance to take their breath isn’t all a bad thing,” says Ben Sheppard, of the Permian Basin Association in Midland, Texas. “The industry has been white hot for so long.”