Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Freddie Gray mistrial tarnishes image of Baltimore police

Jazmin Holloway sits below a mural depicting Freddie Gray on Wednesday at the intersection of his arrest in Baltimore.
Juliet Linderman Associated Press

BALTIMORE – The Baltimore Police Department is a clear loser in the no-win situation left by a hung jury in the state’s first effort to convict an officer in the death of Freddie Gray.

Both defense attorneys and prosecutors portrayed the department as so dysfunctional its officers either aren’t aware of mandatory orders or ignore commands without consequence. First responders described being unfamiliar with first aid. Officers said they only check their email once a month, on old computers that barely work.

When Gray finally arrived at the Western District station injured and comatose, Officer Zachary Novak testified he tried to revive him with a “sternum rub” – a pain stimulus that involves grinding the chest with a fist. “I was never qualified to do it. I just saw it a few times in my career,” Novak said.

The jury deadlocked Wednesday on all four charges against Officer William Porter: manslaughter, assault, reckless endangerment and misconduct. Prosecutors portrayed Porter as a callous officer who intentionally failed to buckle Gray into a seat belt and didn’t call an ambulance even after Gray indicated he needed medical aid. But Porter said officers rarely belted prisoners, if ever, despite their general order requiring them to do so.

Witness after witness told similar stories reflecting institutional failures and chaotic, dangerous situations. Young officers on patrol weren’t adequately trained or mentored, they said, and simply tried to do their best despite next-to-no experience. Porter even described how his academy training was disrupted when a teacher accidentally shot a student during an exercise.

Prosecutors sought to show that a single officer failed in his duty. The defense exploited deep fissures between the police and the people of Baltimore, saying the department failed its officers as well as the city it’s designed to protect.

As the three-week trial progressed, jurors got schooled in aspects of policing that rarely show up on TV.

“The case is emblematic of a bigger issue: In the wake of scandal, the bureaucrats roll out an official police department that doesn’t really exist,” said Eugene O’Donnell, a former officer who teaches at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York. “Cops are alienated from the public, like in Baltimore. But in every department, cops are often alienated from their own bureaucracy, and that’s a huge issue.”

Officer Mark Gladhill testified he had never belted a prisoner, and couldn’t recall any of his emergency medical training, let alone what he should do when prisoners struggle to breathe. Officer Matthew Wood said he had never seen anyone buckle a prisoner in a van.

Prosecutors said such testimony reflects a “culture of silence” in which police protect their own. But if the problem is bad barrels rather than one bad apple, “we want the entire institution to be held accountable” said Brian Garrett, a University of Virginia professor who specializes in policing and civil rights litigation.

“We know police departments have a bad culture of tolerating brutality, but it’s incredibly difficult to challenge a culture in a court case. It’s these officers who are on trial, but the reputation of the police department was irreparably damaged when Freddie Gray died.”

Baltimore’s mayor, Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, welcomed a U.S. Justice Department investigation focusing on allegations of excessive force and unconstitutional searches and arrests. Police Commissioner Kevin Davis said he expects results next year.

Meanwhile, other juries will soon consider whether the department’s dysfunctions justify saving Porter’s fellow officers from jail.

“I think they’re scapegoats,” said David Weinstein, a Miami-based trial attorney and former state and federal prosecutor. “But the department, in the long run, is going to take it hard.

“To paint a picture of an entire department that’s inherently corrupt, that every cop is out there to convict someone who hasn’t committed a crime or wants to trample on that person’s civil rights, then the defense can say: Don’t take it out on William Porter,” he said.