Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Carolyn Hax: OK to propose without diamond ring

Washington Post

Dear Carolyn: I’m clumsy. About two months ago, a car cut me off, causing me to wreck my scooter. The result: a broken hip and two broken legs. A month in the hospital and a month out of work too.

In the wake of my accident, family and friends came together to support me not only emotionally, but also financially. To the tune of about $3,500. The generosity was amazing, except for the predicament it’s put me in.

Six months before my accident, I started saving for a ring to propose to my amazing, beautiful girlfriend of six years.

But let’s say I propose and she says yes. News will undoubtedly spread to that support network. My fear is some of those people will be under the impression they bought the ring. I certainly don’t want to do anything to hurt those who helped me; however, I can’t put off a proposal for much longer, for her needs and mine.

Do I just need to wait it out? – In A Clumsiness-Caused Conundrum

Normally in these situations I can speak only for myself. It just so happens, though, that over the years I’ve heard from a steady stream of women who reject the whole notion of waiting around for a proposal, period, much less for a reason unspoken to them by their prospective mates.

At this point you’re already looking at proposing 10 months after deciding to propose. Wow.

Waiting till you’ve saved your desired amount gives the jewelry more agency than it does the woman. Would she want that? Would you want to marry someone who’d want that?

Besides – when two people want to marry each other, that’s pretty darn romantic without sparkly hardware. Certainly gems are a lovely gesture; if not exploitively mined, I have no objection to them.

So just propose already. If the ring is important to you, present her with a pretty, non-engagement ring that you promise to replace when your medical bills are just an unpleasant memory.