Arrow-right Camera

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Sunday, October 13, 2019  Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Partly Cloudy Night 46° Partly Cloudy
News >  Pacific NW

Two Washington electors sue over law on election results

Washington state presidential elector Levi Guerra, center, joined by fellow elector P. Bret Chiafalo, right, announce that they’re asking members of the Electoral College to pick a Republican “consensus candidate” rather than Donald Trump during a news conference in front of the Legislative Building on Wednesday, Nov. 30, 2016, in Olympia. (Steve Bloom / Olympian)
Washington state presidential elector Levi Guerra, center, joined by fellow elector P. Bret Chiafalo, right, announce that they’re asking members of the Electoral College to pick a Republican “consensus candidate” rather than Donald Trump during a news conference in front of the Legislative Building on Wednesday, Nov. 30, 2016, in Olympia. (Steve Bloom / Olympian)
By Jim Brunner Seattle Times

SEATTLE – Two Washington state electors have filed a federal lawsuit challenging a law that would fine them up to $1,000 each if they disregard the state popular vote in the November presidential election.

Democratic electors Bret Chiafalo and Levi Guerra argue such penalties are unconstitutional, and that they should be able to cast their votes as they see fit when the Electoral College meets Dec. 19.

A hearing on their request for an injunction barring the state from enforcing the law is scheduled for Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Seattle.

While that request is legally narrow, it is part of a long-shot effort by some electors across the country to deny President-elect Donald Trump the White House – a movement gaining more attention after reports that the CIA has concluded Russia interfered in the election to aid Trump.

The lawsuit has caught the attention of Trump’s campaign. Attorneys for the president-elect filed a motion Monday seeking to intervene in the case, arguing the lawsuit “threatens to undermine the many laws in other states that sensibly bind their electors’ votes to represent the will of the citizens, undermining the Electoral College.”

Chiafalo and Guerra, two of Washington’s 12 Democratic electors, signed pledges this year committing to cast their electoral votes for Hillary Clinton, who easily won Washington in the Nov. 8 election.

But they’re willing to break those pledges as part of a national movement of so-called “Hamilton Electors,” who are seeking to deny Trump the 270 Electoral College votes needed to make him president.

As Democratic electors, Chiafalo and Guerra were already assumed to be in Clinton’s column – so they can’t do anything to reduce Trump’s Electoral College count. But they’re trying to persuade Republican electors in other states to split from Trump and unite with them behind an as-yet-unnamed alternative GOP candidate.

“This is an emergency situation,” Chiafalo, of Everett, said in an interview Monday. He and Guerra, who lives in Grant County, have said they’d defy state law and support such a compromise Republican candidate when the Electoral College meets Dec. 19 for what normally is a symbolic vote.

If 37 Republican electors were to withhold their votes from Trump, the president-elect would be denied an Electoral College majority, sending the decision to the U.S. House of Representatives. The GOP-dominated House would be required to pick from among the top three electoral vote-getters, meaning Trump could still be made president.

In a seven-page complaint filed last week, attorneys for Chiafalo and Guerra argued Washington’s law penalizing electors for voting their consciences violates the Constitution and renders the Electoral College meaningless.

Their complaint quotes Alexander Hamilton, one of the nation’s Founding Fathers, who wrote the Electoral College ought to serve as a stopgap against unqualified or corrupt candidates and would prevent “foreign powers” from gaining “an improper ascendant in our councils.”

Chiafalo, originally a Bernie Sanders supporter, said before the election he might not cast an electoral vote for Clinton, whom he expected to win.

Similar lawsuits have been filed by electors in Colorado and by a Democratic lawmaker in California.

In Colorado, Republican Secretary of State Wayne Williams blasted the lawsuit by two electors there as an “arrogant” effort to nullify the popular vote in that state, according to The Denver Post.

In the Nov. 8 election, Trump won enough states to receive 302 Electoral College votes, compared with 232 for Clinton, despite her lead of more than 2.6 million in the national popular vote.

Reaction by Washington officials to the electors’ lawsuit was muted.

A spokesman for Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson, a Democrat, said his office would be filing a legal response in the case by the end of the day Monday.

The lawsuit also named Secretary of State Kim Wyman, a Republican, and Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat, as defendants. Spokespersons for both offices declined to comment Monday on the merits of the case.

Dave Ammons, a spokesman for Wyman, said her office was working to figure out how to administer the $1,000 penalty for so-called “faithless electors” – which has never actually been assessed here.

The state law creating the penalty was enacted after a Republican elector, Mike Padden, in 1976 declined to cast his vote for Gerald Ford, who’d won the state. Padden, now a state senator, backed Ronald Reagan instead.

Subscribe to the Morning Review newsletter

Get the day’s top headlines delivered to your inbox every morning by subscribing to our newsletter.

You have been successfully subscribed!
There was a problem subscribing you to the newsletter. Double check your email and try again, or email webteam@spokesman.com