Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Partly Cloudy Night 37° Partly Cloudy
News >  Features

Carolyn Hax: Troubled marriage needs honesty most

Washington Post

Dear Carolyn:

I’ve been separated from my wife of 19 years and three kids for a few months. The separation stemmed from my infidelity – a mistake I made to run from my marital problems instead of to communicate, try to work through them, and take a stand for my happiness. It was cowardly and I regret it deeply.

We are in couple’s counseling and both want to find a way to reconcile, but we are struggling to get there. She can’t forgive me, and I am unable to convince her I am sorry enough without completely submitting and denying my authenticity.

I miss my kids terribly and this is hard on them. The truth is, though, that I want to reconcile only to unify the family. For all our sakes, personally and financially. Spending time alone with my wife is something I dread, as she is angry, judgmental, and constantly telling me all the things I’m doing wrong. This describes our marriage previous to the infidelity.

When is it time to give up and move on? I’m living half a life.

– Separated

Your affair was a way, a bad one obviously, to avoid disrupting your marriage: You wanted the status quo because of money, kids, and the general terror most people feel at the idea of walking forward into the big scary unknown. So you opted to satisfy your intense emotional cravings, figuratively speaking, by sneaking candy bars in the closet and hoping you wouldn’t get caught.

Now that you’re caught and your marriage is all disrupted anyway, what are you doing? You’re trying to put it back together, an impulse both understandable and utterly mind-boggling.

Understandable, see above: big scary unknown.

Mind-boggling because you’re already halfway through the hardest part, and you want to turn back? You want to scrape and grovel and sorry sorry sorry your way back under the same roof with your exact same needs unmet?

You’re in counseling, so obviously there are hours of discussion happening that you can’t spell out here. But if you’re avoiding your basic truth – “she is angry, judgmental, and constantly telling me all the things I’m doing wrong. This describes our marriage previous to the infidelity” – because you’re trying to “convince her I am sorry enough,” then anything you build will rest on the same old marital foundation crack.

The infidelity was on you, yes, and if you’re sorry you did it versus sorry you got caught, then, good. But the misery of your marriage prior to it and since is 50-50, your contribution and hers, because that’s how marriages work. 50-50. Even if one spouse’s 50 is being a complete jerk and the other spouse’s 50 is putting up with a complete jerk, it’s 50-50.

When your goal for couple’s therapy is to preserve your marriage, you have powerful incentive to hold back words you think might upset your wife. Such lies of omission are what make one spouse withdraw emotionally, another spouse issue constant angry corrections, and other men/women so profoundly tempting.

But truth-telling without shading to control its impact, I’d argue, is exactly what you two need to move forward. You can’t make her admit her 50, but you can set the example by admitting yours. As long as you’re both still trying to “win,” your marriage won’t stand a chance.

—0— —0— —0—

Hi, Carolyn:

For years, we and three other couples have rented a vacation cottage for a week of fun and camaraderie, with the substantial rent split evenly between us. This year, one couple has unanticipated issues that will allow them to stay only half of the week.

This couple is arguing that they will be there for only part of the week and should not pay for a full week. Others say they should pay their full share because, after all, their room will be available to them and if they don’t use it for the entire week then it should not be left to the rest of us to cover that expense. Plus, if they were not coming at all we could have rented a smaller cottage at a considerably lower price. Can you help resolve this?

– Vacation Dilemma

If their issue is financial, then it would be a kindness for the group to absorb the extra expense, to say, “You’re family, we want you here, we’ll make it work.” You’d be paying for their presence, which makes sense.

If they just have a scheduling conflict, then they pay their full share. Otherwise the other three couples would be paying extra for the fourth couple’s absence, which makes no sense when presence is the whole point of this vacation.

Absent hardship, it’s also unfortunate and tone deaf at best for this couple to inject a nickel-and-dime debate into what seems to be an enduring, enriching, harmonious balance of eight adults. What do they hope to accomplish by sticking their friends with this expense? I’ve posed this to you, but it’s a question worth kindly running by them.

Email Carolyn at, follow her on Facebook at or chat with her online at noon Eastern time each Friday at

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe now to get breaking news alerts in your email inbox

Get breaking news delivered to your inbox as it happens.