WASHINGTON – A New York judge is scolding the government for efforts to shame Apple for refusing to surrender information from customers’ iPhones.
U.S. Magistrate Judge James Orenstein said Monday that the government is stretching a 1789 law to get “impermissibly absurd results.”
His Brooklyn ruling in a drug case came just before a Tuesday congressional hearing. FBI Director James Comey and Apple General Counsel Bruce Sewell are expected to testify on encryption and “balancing Americans’ security and privacy.”
Orenstein noted his decision was not controlling but could still have “precedential value” in a dozen cases nationwide facing the same legal question.
One case concerns Apple’s fight against a California judge’s order to create specialized software to help the FBI hack into an iPhone linked to San Bernardino attacks investigation.
Local journalism is essential.
Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.
Subscribe to the Coronavirus newsletter
Get the day’s latest Coronavirus news delivered to your inbox by subscribing to our newsletter.