Washington regulators erred when they blocked Avista Corp.’s sale to Hydro One Ltd. by exaggerating the political risks to Avista’s customers from the province of Ontario’s ownership in Hydro One, the two companies argued Monday.
In a request for reconsideration, the companies said the state Utilities and Transportation Commission failed to specify “how Provincial actions could actually impact Avista” and downplayed the benefits of the sale to the Spokane-based utility’s customers.
The three-member UTC has 20 days to act on the request for reconsideration. The companies asked the UTC to finish any additional reviews of the sale by the end of January.
Avista and Hydro One have a March 29 deadline to conclude the sale, and the Toronto-based utility’s financing for the purchase expires shortly afterward.
The companies face a difficult path for “rescuing this deal,” Rob Rains, senior energy analyst for Washington Analysis LLC, wrote in a recent research note.
The province of Ontario’s 47 percent ownership in Hydro One was a key consideration during the review of the sale. In its Dec. 5 ruling, the three-member UTC said Hydro One lacks sufficient independence from the province to be an appropriate merger partner for Avista.
The UTC cited Premier Doug Ford’s politically motivated decision to seek removal of Hydro One’s board of directors and its chief executive officer shortly after he was sworn into office last summer. Hydro One’s credit rating dropped as a result of the sudden ouster, and Avista’s and Hydro One’s stock prices dropped.
“In particular, the Commission calls Hydro One a ‘different company’ than the one that agreed to buy Avista in 2017,” Rains wrote. Ford’s “ongoing efforts to exert control over Hydro One” were problematic for the commission and “should not inspire confidence of a comeback for this merger,” he said.
Rains said UTC members might be reassured if the premier sent them a letter indicating his efforts to influence Hydro One are finished. “… But we do not see much reason for him to take such a step at this time,” he said.
Hydro One hired Seattle law firm K&L Gates to submit the 36-page request for reconsideration.
In the document, Avista and Hydro One said the UTC should take a closer look at 82 commitments intended to protect Avista’s independence after the sale and benefit customers.
The companies also submitted a Nov. 29 letter from Stephen Rhodes, Ontario deputy minister of energy. He wrote the letter to Hydro One’s new chairman, Tom Woods, at Woods’ request.
In the letter, Rhodes declined to provide an affidavit indicating the province wouldn’t meddle in Avista’s affairs after the sale. He said Hydro One has already made a series of commitments to insulate Avista’s business operations after the sale closes.
In addition, Rhodes said government officials are limited in their ability to dictate the actions of future governments in terms of legislation and regulation.
Subscribe to the Morning Review newsletter
Get the day’s top headlines delivered to your inbox every morning by subscribing to our newsletter.