Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Fog 27° Fog

Carolyn Hax: Grandparents won’t visit newborn twins

Washington Post

Hi, Carolyn: My wife and I had twins this past summer, and most of our family has cycled through and visited them. All, that is, except for her parents. We’ve received excuses like he had a surgery and can’t travel (outpatient surgery in May), it’s too expensive (we’ve offered to pay), and it’s just too cold to travel now.

Talking to my sister-in-law recently, we learned the issue is that we’re housing all visitors in a nearby hotel (within walking distance!). We have a condo, and there really isn’t that much room, and I just don’t feel comfortable hosting them in a now-cramped space like we did before the birth of the babies.

Apparently they feel they’re not welcome, and we (rather I) don’t really want them there.

I’m quite lost on what to do. I don’t want to do something that prevents the twins from knowing their grandparents, but really, a small condo with four adults and two infants is just not a good recipe. Help! – Apparently the Ogre

My warmest congratulations on the twins, and my deepest condolences on the in-laws who don’t know how to use their words.

Your sister-in-law was decent to form mature speech on their behalf, and not only that – she also gave you the advantage of knowing (I presume) without your in-laws knowing you know. Keep it that way.

That means you can talk to your in-laws about this as if everything is dandy – a facade they seem to want to maintain through those thin excuses – while also addressing the real problems.

First, there’s the ogre problem. To mitigate that, you need to be the one extending enthusiastic invitations for them to visit. “I can’t wait for you to meet your grandkids. How does [suggested date] sound? If it works, I’ll buy the tickets today.” You. On the phone. Today.

Second, there’s the offsite-housing problem. To mitigate that, express whatever regret you can honestly express: “Of course we’d want nothing more than to have you/everyone stay with us as usual. All those babies took care of that, though.”

The second message is actually best delivered by your wife. They see you as the ogre who doesn’t want them, so you issue the invitation; they don’t see your wife as pro-hotel, so she insists on the hotel. Present a pointedly united front.

It’s no guarantee, of course. People who want to believe something will do so despite any and all evidence to the contrary. (Ahem.)

But you can make sure their only options are either to rethink their position based on new evidence, or to cling to it with little valid defense.

You can also, of course, just host them in the condo, but on a superficial level that’s a decision to invite sleepless chaos, of which I’m sure you have more than enough right now. Routine is often all that stands between parents of multiples and the emotional cliff, and it’s hard to think of a more effective routine-buster than houseguests in tight quarters who come with specific expectations but don’t use their words.

Speaking of – if your in-laws do ever visit, I hope you can invite them into your routines so they can see how things work, feel invested themselves and maybe gin up some empathy.

Anyway. On a deeper level, housing your in-laws in the condo would be a choice to appease the irrational people who are complaining about you behind your back, which is a step you should neither take lightly nor without your wife’s full agreement and support.

You’d have to agree (1) that it’s worth it to you (meaning, yourselves, each other and your babies) to make a onetime exception, and (2) that you’re both strong and committed enough to put the boundary back afterward and keep it there. If the boundary is still needed, that is; one weekend in a fishbowl with four adults and two babies might be sufficient to prompt your in-laws to have an ideological conversion on the matter of bunking as one.

The decision to try this is a lot to manage. Think and talk it through carefully.

If it helps, you won’t always have to manage exactly this problem under exactly these circumstances; time means change, and change is rarely plainer to witness than in children. A hotel now doesn’t mean your kids won’t know their grandparents ever. (And if it does, by some fluke, then that will have been said elders’ choice, not yours.) Your problem now is in many ways a problem only of now – and it’s OK to see it that way as it suits.

Email Carolyn at, follow her on Facebook at or chat with her online at 9 a.m. each Friday at

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe to the Spokane7 email newsletter

Get the day’s top entertainment headlines delivered to your inbox every morning.