Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Cloudy 45° Cloudy

This column reflects the opinion of the writer. To learn about the differences between a news story and an opinion column, click here.

Opinion >  Guest Opinion

Sen. Mike Padden: Inslee and Ferguson sacrificing safety for political points

Sen. Mike Padden

Many people were surprised by a recent disclosure that the state Department of Licensing would no longer provide Social Security numbers for the database that law enforcement uses to conduct background checks for gun purchases.

They shouldn’t have been.

For anyone watching closely enough, it has been clear for some time that Gov. Jay Inslee and Attorney General Bob Ferguson have made their political opposition to the federal government a higher priority than the safety of Washingtonians and our law enforcement community.

If law enforcement agencies are unable to obtain and confirm basic information, public safety may be compromised. Social Security numbers are instrumental in identifying mental-health records and convictions during background checks. Banning access to this information could result in more guns getting into the wrong hands.

Why would an administration that has continually pushed for more background checks advocate such a reckless policy that makes such checks harder to conduct?

It appears that the war of words and lawsuits between this Washington and the other Washington is the culprit. Since the election of President Donald Trump, Inslee and Ferguson have been using every means at their disposal to oppose the president’s immigration agenda.

Serving as the loyal opposition is fair game, and state officials have every right to oppose a president with whom they fundamentally disagree. In their zealousness to do so, however, Inslee and Ferguson appear to have put their ideology ahead of public safety.

This recent decision is the latest in a chain of shameful actions by the executive branch.

In February of last year, a state trooper appeared to get in hot water for detaining a Mexican citizen convicted of drug charges until he could be picked up by the feds.

What happened next is puzzling. The trooper was placed on administrative review, essentially an allegation of misconduct. Although cleared of the initial accusation of unlawfully detaining the individual, the trooper was found to have violated two agency rules.

While for legitimate policy violations, the reprimand only came about due to the trooper being perceived as having cooperated with ICE. This was a chilling message sent to all law enforcement that if you work with ICE, you will be second-guessed, put under the microscope and possibly punished.

Inslee followed up a few days later with an executive order prohibiting state agencies from inquiring about a person’s immigration status or assisting federal immigration authorities, unless required by law.

Even after Senate inquiries, many questions about the practical effect of the executive order remain unanswered.

Concerns that politics may be interfering with law enforcement continued this year, with additional attacks against Immigration and Customs Enforcement from Inslee and Ferguson.

In January, the attorney general announced a lawsuit against Motel 6 for handing over guest information to ICE agents, which had resulted in the detainment of at least six individuals.

He also sued the ICE detention facility in Tacoma on questionable and technical legal grounds.

News that the state Department of Licensing was also cooperating with federal officers resulted in an immediate backlash from Inslee, who ordered a halt to the practice. Agency rules were changed over a weekend, with no input from law enforcement and with little apparent concern for the safety of Washingtonians or law enforcement officials, and DOL Deputy Director Jeff DeVere was forced to resign.

Law enforcement needs to be free to do its job and keep the public, including immigrant communities, safe.

Given the lack of clarity in the executive order, how can an officer who is trying to identify a person in a traffic stop know what information is allowed to be used and what is not?

How do we tell the public that we want to keep guns out of the hands of those with a history of criminal behavior or mental illness, and then make it harder to learn that information?

How much longer can we permit Gov. Inslee and AG Ferguson to sacrifice public safety in order to score political points against D.C.?

Sen. Mike Padden of Spokane Valley, a former district court judge, is the ranking Republican on the state Senate Law and Justice Committee. He represents the 4th Legislative District.

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe to the Coronavirus newsletter

Get the day’s latest Coronavirus news delivered to your inbox by subscribing to our newsletter.