Four men who have never held elected office are vying for outgoing Spokane Valley City Councilman Sam Wood’s seat, and they all say homelessness is one of the most important issues facing the region.
Three of the men running for Spokane Valley Council position 6 –Walmart Assistant Manager Shaun Stanfield, retired housing and community development specialist Pat Stretch and chiropractor Bo Tucker – are first-time candidates. Retired teacher Tim Hattenburg has run unsuccessfully for the state Legislature twice.
Hattenburg, who is also a former Spokane County Library board trustee, said he hopes to sit down with community members and council members who have different attitudes toward development in Spokane Valley and have a realistic discussion on how the area should grow.
“We’re going to grow,” he said. “People say, ‘We don’t want to grow anymore, we want to be the old Valley.’ I want that too, but it’s not going to happen.”
He said he supports keeping some areas of Spokane Valley zoned as single family but that duplexes and apartments can fit into some neighborhoods and can work near arterials. He said a duplex replaced a nuisance home in his neighborhood that often had criminal activity and that the new duplex improved the feel of the neighborhood.
Stretch said he also would like to see apartments in corridors and on bus lines. Stretch, who has worked in victim advocacy services and spent more than 20 years in the Coast Guard, said Spokane Valley can’t just have single-family homes because housing is needed at all income levels and that many working class and young people starting out can’t afford their own home.
He said Spokane Valley needs to “grow smart” and make sure young people who move to work in Spokane Valley’s business community have housing they can afford.
Tucker said Spokane Valley needs apartments and they need to go in places where they are appropriate and there is infrastructure. He said when he was in college in California, his apartments were the only option he and his family could afford, and he believes that option needs to be available in Spokane Valley.
Affordable housing and the aging population in Spokane Valley are Stanfield’s two biggest concerns. He said many seniors will soon need to downsize from their larger home as they retire and are no longer able to drive. He said apartments for seniors, or other affordable housing projects, will soon be needed across the Valley, but those projects should be built in areas that have enough infrastructure to handle them.
He said more affordable housing could also be a long-term way to reduce homelessness in Spokane Valley. Stanfield said his family was homeless when he was around 9 years old, after his stepfather was arrested for child molestation. He said his mother’s landlord sold the property they were living in and that the family ended up living in a KOA campground.
Stanfield said he often deals with people who are homeless at his job at Walmart, with people living in vehicles in the parking lot. He said people often have negative stereotypes about homeless people that aren’t necessarily true, such as they are not willing to work or only take handouts. He said his mother, and many others who find themselves homeless would never have chosen that for themselves.
He also disagreed with the claim that the more resources are available, the more the homeless population will grow.
“From a humanitarian standpoint, we owe it to the people who are here, whether they’re homeless or not, to take care of them,” Stanfield said. “As an elected member of city council, they are my constituents.”
Tucker said he’s volunteered through his church to help the homeless. He argued that some aren’t able to help themselves because they may have medical and mental health issues but that many will take services and not improve their lives.
Tucker said Spokane Valley should study homelessness in its own community and continue to work with Spokane County and the City of Spokane to provide services instead of starting new projects in Spokane Valley.
He said the city needs to spend more time analyzing homelessness to find what works in the long term before “throwing money” at the problem. He said once he sees research, he might consider other options.
Stretch said homelessness in Spokane Valley isn’t the same as homelessness in the City of Spokane and that the government cannot approach it in the same way. He said he disagrees with Spokane’s housing-first policy, arguing that if people have a drug problem or a mental illness, they will quickly sour the relationships they have with the few landlords who are willing to rent to them.
He said the services for the homeless are in the city of Spokane and that’s where they should stay.
Stretch also said the city of Spokane Valley should do what it can to stop camping on public land because that makes many people who want to use the parks feel unsafe.
“If there’s a homeless person and a taxpaying citizen using our parks and only one gets to use it, it should be the taxpaying citizen.” he said. “If my sister doesn’t feel safe, she can’t use it.”
Hattenburg said Spokane Valley should consider having its own shelter because many people on the edges of Spokane Valley who are homeless might have a hard time accessing services in the City of Spokane. He said Spokane Valley should sit down and work collaboratively with the City of Spokane.
“You can’t just say the closest city is OK,” he said. “At some point, we need to have a shelter.”
Hattenburg said churches can’t be the only institutions offering help to the homeless in Spokane Valley and that the city needs to do what it can to ensure there’s a place for people to go.
All four candidates are concerned about public safety in Spokane Valley, with Stretch saying his garage has been broken into multiple times and that many people don’t feel safe using public property.
Stretch said Spokane Valley should consider setting up downtown ambassadors who patrol public areas, like the ambassadors who work for Spokane’s Downtown Partnership. He said ambassadors likely aren’t as expensive as police officers and having them in public areas may make people feel safer using the city’s parks.
Stretch also said the city could consider going to voters to pay for essential services such as street funding in the future. Spokane Valley could have issues paying for streets in the future due to decreasing landline fees that pay for road improvements, as more Spokane Valley residents give up landlines in their homes.
If a levy isn’t an option, he said the neighborhoods with the worst streets in the city could create road improvement districts and that there are ways to help low-income residents who can’t necessarily afford to be apart from a district.
Tucker said he would prefer to look at other funding sources, using surplus revenue, or cut expenses first but would considering going to voters to pay for street improvements if the city’s budget was already as lean as it could be.
Stanfield said the city hasn’t raised its property tax in years and that it might need to develop enough infrastructure to keep up with the city’s growing population. He said increasing taxes isn’t popular but that it could be necessary.
“Taxes in general are how we pay for everything and, in general, it’s us doing our part to take care of our city,” he said.
Hattenburg has raised far more than the candidates running against him. He has received about $12,700 and spent about $8,800. Tucker, who received a contribution from sitting councilwoman Pam Haley, has raised $4,400 and spent $2,200.
Stretch, who has received two donations from sitting councilman Arne Woodard, has raised $1,800 in contributions and spent $2,700. Stanfield has not raised or spent money on his campaign.
Subscribe to the Morning Review newsletter
Get the day’s top headlines delivered to your inbox every morning by subscribing to our newsletter.